These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32655064)

  • 1. A simple, cost-effective, and novel method for determining the efficiency of industrial and commercial noise-canceling earmuffs.
    Zangari S; Mirowsky JE
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(100):108-115. PubMed ID: 32655064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Attenuation of earmuffs used simultaneously with respiratory protective devices].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2017 May; 68(3):349-361. PubMed ID: 28512363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 3687731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-Cost Earmuff Shown to Significantly Reduce Cast-Saw Noise.
    Baes T; Ludwigsen D; Sardelli M; Atkinson P; Atkinson TS
    Orthop Nurs; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 40(4):240-245. PubMed ID: 34397979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protection Devices Based on Microphone in Real Ear.
    Biabani A; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Saf Health Work; 2017 Dec; 8(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 29276635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Nanocomposite Earmuff.
    Ahmadi S; Nassiri P; Ghasemi I; Monazzam Ep MR
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 26234977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of low-pass filtered words in a noisy and reverberant environment with and without earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2075414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
    Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
    Pawlas K; Grzesik J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attenuation of low-frequency noise by hearing protectors.
    Pääkkönen R; Tikkanen J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1991 Apr; 35(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 2042885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
    Paddan GS; Lower MC
    Ind Health; 2021 Sep; 59(4):204-219. PubMed ID: 33692247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A new type of active noise cancellation earmuffs].
    Yu WB; Wu Z
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2005 Aug; 18(4):306-7. PubMed ID: 16224850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clamping pressure and circum-aural earmuffs.
    Williams W
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(35):45-50. PubMed ID: 18025755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of noise reduction by earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral responses in very low birth weight preterm infants.
    Duran R; Ciftdemir NA; Ozbek UV; Berberoğlu U; Durankuş F; Süt N; Acunaş B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 76(10):1490-3. PubMed ID: 22824198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.