These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32655171)

  • 21. New Robust Scale Transformation Methods in the Presence of Outlying Common Items.
    He Y; Cui Z; Osterlind SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):613-626. PubMed ID: 29881031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect.
    Kawilapat S; Maneeton B; Maneeton N; Prasitwattanaseree S; Kongsuk T; Arunpongpaisal S; Leejongpermpoon J; Sukhawaha S; Traisathit P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 36224520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incorporating calibration errors in oral reading fluency scoring.
    Qiao X; Kamata A; Potgieter C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.
    Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple Equating of Separate IRT Calibrations.
    Battauz M
    Psychometrika; 2016 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 27699559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Review of the Effects on IRT Item Parameter Estimates with a Focus on Misbehaving Common Items in Test Equating.
    Michaelides MP
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():167. PubMed ID: 21833230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the Connections Between Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory: A Note on True Score Evaluation for Polytomous Items via Item Response Modeling.
    Raykov T; Dimitrov DM; Marcoulides GA; Harrison M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Dec; 79(6):1198-1209. PubMed ID: 31619845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design.
    Wiberg M; Bränberg K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):349-361. PubMed ID: 29881012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparisons of item difficulty and passing scores by test equating in a basic medical education curriculum.
    Hwang JE; Kim NJ; Kim SY
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 31(2):147-157. PubMed ID: 31230437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.