These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32655181)

  • 1. Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):727-753. PubMed ID: 32655181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():110-130. PubMed ID: 33231301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation.
    Qin H; Guo L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1916-1935. PubMed ID: 37231327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Rejoinder.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):528-529. PubMed ID: 27339703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Q-Matrix Estimation Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models: Based on Partial Known Q-Matrix.
    Wang D; Cai Y; Tu D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020 Apr; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 32308032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multiple logistic regression-based (MLR-B) Q-matrix validation method for cognitive diagnosis models:A confirmatory approach.
    Tu D; Chiu J; Ma W; Wang D; Cai Y; Ouyang X
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2080-2092. PubMed ID: 35819718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining regularization and logistic regression model to validate the Q-matrix for cognitive diagnosis model.
    Sun X; Zhang T; Nie C; Song N; Xin T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38646968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning Large Q-Matrix by Restricted Boltzmann Machines.
    Li C; Ma C; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1010-1041. PubMed ID: 35089496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications.
    Chen J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 41(4):277-293. PubMed ID: 29881093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.