155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32658368)
1. Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?
Peng L; Liu YH; He SX; Di XP; Shen H; Luo DY
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Sep; 39(7):1958-1965. PubMed ID: 32658368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pollack BL; Popiel P; Toaff MC; Drugge E; Bielawski A; Sacks A; Bibi M; Friedman-Ciment R; LeBron K; Alishahian L; Phillips D; Rubino SR; Pollack S; Khan RS; Khan ES; Pape DM; Grimes CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
Bradley MS; Bickhaus JA; Amundsen CL; Newcomb LK; Truong T; Weidner AC; Siddiqui NY
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen S; Liu Y; Peng L; Chen Y; Shen H; Luo D
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):993-1000. PubMed ID: 36598553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial of permanent vs absorbable suture for uterosacral ligament suspension.
Kowalski JT; Genadry R; Ten Eyck P; Bradley CS
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):785-790. PubMed ID: 32047968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester versus Polypropylene.
Lee J; Oh S; Jeon MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):1503-1507. PubMed ID: 33310165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Douligeris A; Kathopoulis N; Zachariou E; Mortaki A; Zacharakis D; Kypriotis K; Chatzipapas I; Protopapas A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):477-487. PubMed ID: 38493827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture.
Chung CP; Miskimins R; Kuehl TJ; Yandell PM; Shull BL
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Feb; 23(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 21892683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture.
Wong MJ; Rezvan A; Bhatia NN; Yazdany T
Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1389-94. PubMed ID: 21681596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: comparison of absorbable vs. permanent suture for apical fixation.
Kasturi S; Bentley-Taylor M; Woodman PJ; Terry CL; Hale DS
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 22402640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vermeulen CKM; Schuurman B; Coolen AWM; Meijs-Hermanns PR; van Leijsen SAL; Veen J; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Dec; 130(13):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 37271736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse.
Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
Padoa A; Ziv Y; Tsviban A; Tomashev R; Smorgick N; Fligelman T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr; 283():112-117. PubMed ID: 36827752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
