134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32658399)
1. Cerumenolytic Efficacy of 2.5% Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Docusate Sodium: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Piromchai P; Laohakittikul C; Khunnawongkrit S; Srirompotong S
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e842-e847. PubMed ID: 32658399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ceruminolytic effects of docusate sodium: a randomized, controlled trial.
Singer AJ; Sauris E; Viccellio AW
Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Sep; 36(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 10969225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized clinical trial of docusate, triethanolamine polypeptide, and irrigation in cerumen removal in children.
Whatley VN; Dodds CL; Paul RI
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Dec; 157(12):1177-80. PubMed ID: 14662569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Cerumenolytic Activities of New and Currently Used Agents.
Anh NQ; Numthavaj P; Bhongmakapat T
Ear Nose Throat J; 2022 Feb; 101(2_suppl):31S-36S. PubMed ID: 33512244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative in vitro study on the cerumenolytic effect of docusate sodium versus 2.5% sodium bicarbonate using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy.
Srisukhumchai C; Kasemsiri P; Rattanaanekchai T; Srirompotong S; Yordpratum U; Sakolsinsiri C
J Otol; 2020 Sep; 15(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 32884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ototoxicity of intratympanic docusate sodium and mineral oil in the guinea pig.
Nader ME; Saliba I
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Mar; 146(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 22101097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.
Burton MJ; Dorée CJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (3):CD004400. PubMed ID: 12918014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of a randomized trial comparing 2 cerumenolytic agents.
Lemon HM; Mazyck-Brown J; Cancellaro TA; Darden PM; Basco WT
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Dec; 157(12):1181-3. PubMed ID: 14662570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Practice tip. Which cerumenolytic?
Kamien M
Aust Fam Physician; 1999 Aug; 28(8):817, 828. PubMed ID: 10495532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of common cerumenolytic agents: an in-vitro study.
Bellini MJ; Terry RM; Lewis FA
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Feb; 14(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2465853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.
Burton MJ; Doree C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; (1):CD004326. PubMed ID: 19160236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Earwax (Cerumen Impaction).
Schwartz SR; Magit AE; Rosenfeld RM; Ballachanda BB; Hackell JM; Krouse HJ; Lawlor CM; Lin K; Parham K; Stutz DR; Walsh S; Woodson EA; Yanagisawa K; Cunningham ER
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jan; 156(1_suppl):S1-S29. PubMed ID: 28045591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cerumen Impaction Removal in General Practices: A Comparison of Approved Standard Products.
Meyer F; Preuß R; Angelow A; Chenot JF; Meyer E; Kiel S
J Prim Care Community Health; 2020; 11():2150132720973829. PubMed ID: 33334227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonprescription cerumenolytic.
Chen DA; Caparosa RJ
Am J Otol; 1991 Nov; 12(6):475-6. PubMed ID: 1725243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen.
Fullington D; Song J; Gilles A; Guo X; Hua W; Anderson CE; Griffin J
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2017; 17():5. PubMed ID: 28588421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cerumen removal: comparison of cerumenolytic agents and effect on cognition among the elderly.
Oron Y; Zwecker-Lazar I; Levy D; Kreitler S; Roth Y
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011; 52(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 20417976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the ototoxicity of docusate sodium (colace) in a guinea pig animal model.
Emami N; Ng B; Roskies M; Wazqar L; Makhoul G; Citra D; Daniel SJ
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 41(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 23092833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finding the most effective cerumenolytic.
Saxby C; Williams R; Hickey S
J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Nov; 127(11):1067-70. PubMed ID: 24148313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cerumenolytics with or without manual extraction for impacted earwax: A network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Sridharan K; Sivaramakrishnan G
Clin Otolaryngol; 2021 May; 46(3):464-473. PubMed ID: 33326697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical study of a new cerumenolytic agent.
REINIGER AC; BIALKIN G; GANT JQ; ROSNICK MJ; MONTEBOVI AJ; HALPERN A
AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1959 Mar; 69(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 13626316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
