135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32658544)
1. Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading.
Țurcan A; Howman H; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1966-1976. PubMed ID: 32658544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context.
Țurcan A; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1867-1893. PubMed ID: 27504677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ability to recognise emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements.
Olkoniemi H; Strömberg V; Kaakinen JK
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1212-1223. PubMed ID: 30282526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study.
Filik R; Ţurcan A; Ralph-Nearman C; Pitiot A
Cortex; 2019 Jun; 115():112-122. PubMed ID: 30807881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Adjustment of Complexity on Sarcasm Processing in Chinese: Evidence from Reading Time Indicators.
Li Y; Shi H; Li S; Gao L; Gao X
Brain Sci; 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36831749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment.
Howman HE; Filik R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1729-1744. PubMed ID: 32338575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact.
Filik R; Țurcan A; Thompson D; Harvey N; Davies H; Turner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2130-46. PubMed ID: 26513274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of prosody and context in sarcasm comprehension: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.
Matsui T; Nakamura T; Utsumi A; Sasaki AT; Koike T; Yoshida Y; Harada T; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():74-84. PubMed ID: 27157883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Teaching sarcasm: Evaluating metapragmatic training for typically developing children.
Lee K; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Jun; 75(2):139-145. PubMed ID: 32757569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emotional Processing of Ironic Versus Literal Criticism in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
Barzy M; Filik R; Williams D; Ferguson HJ
Autism Res; 2020 Apr; 13(4):563-578. PubMed ID: 32017394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Sarcasm to Compliment: Context, Intonation, and the Perception of Statements with a Negative Literal Meaning.
Voyer D; Vu JP
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Jun; 45(3):615-24. PubMed ID: 25900533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements.
Olkoniemi H; Ranta H; Kaakinen JK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):433-50. PubMed ID: 26371496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Missing the joke: Reduced rereading of garden-path jokes during mind-wandering.
Zhang H; Qu C; Miller KF; Cortina KS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):638-648. PubMed ID: 31343250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of speaker age on the perception of ironic insults.
Jared D; Pandolfo A
Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Jun; 75(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 33555898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing Appreciation for Sarcasm and Sarcastic Gossip: It Depends on Perspective.
Glenwright M; Tapley B; Rano JKS; Pexman PM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3295-3309. PubMed ID: 29098274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social cognition after head injury: sarcasm and theory of mind.
Channon S; Pellijeff A; Rule A
Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 15781300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading.
Beck SD; Weber A
J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Oct; 49(5):837-863. PubMed ID: 32666211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China.
Zhu N; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):445-463. PubMed ID: 37011176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
