These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32658655)

  • 21. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology.
    Michel MC; Murphy TJ; Motulsky HJ
    Drug Metab Dispos; 2020 Jan; 48(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 31882568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
    Vandenbroucke JP; von Elm E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC; Mulrow CD; Pocock SJ; Poole C; Schlesselman JJ; Egger M;
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Oct; 147(8):W163-94. PubMed ID: 17938389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biostatistical applications in epidemiology.
    Kier KL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2011 Jan; 31(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 21182354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
    Vandenbroucke JP; von Elm E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC; Mulrow CD; Pocock SJ; Poole C; Schlesselman JJ; Egger M;
    Epidemiology; 2007 Nov; 18(6):805-35. PubMed ID: 18049195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Progress report on the guidance for industry for statistical aspects of the design, analysis, and interpretation of chronic rodent carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals.
    Lin KK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):481-501. PubMed ID: 11104389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Replicability, Reproducibility, and Fragility of Research Findings-Ultimately, Caveat Emptor.
    Vetter TR; McGwin G; Pittet JF
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 27183372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On effect size.
    Kelley K; Preacher KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 22545595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Studies of Medical Tests: Design and Analytical Considerations.
    Bullen JA
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S103-S112. PubMed ID: 32658645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved Data Reporting in RQES: from volumes 49, 59, to 84.
    Thomas JR
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 25412125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design, data monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: A review.
    Hamasaki T; Evans SR; Asakura K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(1):28-51. PubMed ID: 29083951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical Process Control: No Hits, No Runs, No Errors?
    Vetter TR; Morrice D
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Feb; 128(2):374-382. PubMed ID: 30531221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-Analysis.
    Hernandez AV; Marti KM; Roman YM
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S97-S102. PubMed ID: 32658658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methods for comparing the results of different studies.
    Eckert SE; Choi YG; Koka S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 14579958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scientific Reporting: Raising the Standards.
    McLeroy KR; Garney W; Mayo-Wilson E; Grant S
    Health Educ Behav; 2016 Oct; 43(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 27624441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):73-108. PubMed ID: 19165298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding.
    Fu EL; Groenwold RHH; Zoccali C; Jager KJ; van Diepen M; Dekker FW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 30215791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.