185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32659324)
1. Multiparameter prediction control of in vitro drug delivery into mycobacterium smegmatis induced by microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.
Li F; Dong Y; Li G; Li Y; Du Y
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2020 Sep; 154():98-107. PubMed ID: 32659324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences.
Keller S; Bruce M; Averkiou MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):833-845. PubMed ID: 30638695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanisms underlying sonoporation: Interaction between microbubbles and cells.
Yang Y; Li Q; Guo X; Tu J; Zhang D
Ultrason Sonochem; 2020 Oct; 67():105096. PubMed ID: 32278246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonoporation-induced cell membrane permeabilization and cytoskeleton disassembly at varied acoustic and microbubble-cell parameters.
Wang M; Zhang Y; Cai C; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):3885. PubMed ID: 29497082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical study of microbubble dynamics in sonoporation.
Yu H; Lin Z; Xu L; Liu D; Shen Y
Ultrasonics; 2015 Aug; 61():136-44. PubMed ID: 25957067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient Gene Delivery by Sonoporation Is Associated with Microbubble Entry into Cells and the Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis Pathway.
Delalande A; Leduc C; Midoux P; Postema M; Pichon C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1913-26. PubMed ID: 25929996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.
Helfield BL; Chen X; Qin B; Watkins SC; Villanueva FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2678-2689. PubMed ID: 28847500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opening of endothelial cell-cell contacts due to sonoporation.
Beekers I; Vegter M; Lattwein KR; Mastik F; Beurskens R; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Verweij MD; Kooiman K
J Control Release; 2020 Jun; 322():426-438. PubMed ID: 32246975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viability of endothelial cells after ultrasound-mediated sonoporation: Influence of targeting, oscillation, and displacement of microbubbles.
van Rooij T; Skachkov I; Beekers I; Lattwein KR; Voorneveld JD; Kokhuis TJA; Bera D; Luan Y; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Kooiman K
J Control Release; 2016 Sep; 238():197-211. PubMed ID: 27469471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.
Burgess MT; Porter TM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):846-858. PubMed ID: 30638968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dependence of sonoporation efficiency on microbubble size: An in vitro monodisperse microbubble study.
van Elburg B; Deprez J; van den Broek M; De Smedt SC; Versluis M; Lajoinie G; Lentacker I; Segers T
J Control Release; 2023 Nov; 363():747-755. PubMed ID: 37778466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of tumor cell lines derived from different tissue on sonoporation efficiency under ultrasound microbubble treatment.
Shi D; Guo L; Duan S; Shang M; Meng D; Cheng L; Li J
Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Sep; 38():598-603. PubMed ID: 27562907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nanodroplet-Vaporization-Assisted Sonoporation for Highly Effective Delivery of Photothermal Treatment.
Liu WW; Liu SW; Liou YR; Wu YH; Yang YC; Wang CR; Li PC
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24753. PubMed ID: 27094209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the sonoporation efficiency of targeted polydisperse microbubble populations using chirp excitation.
McLaughlan J; Ingram N; Smith PR; Harput S; Coletta PL; Evans S; Freear S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Dec; 60(12):2511-20. PubMed ID: 24297017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeted microbubble mediated sonoporation of endothelial cells in vivo.
Skachkov I; Luan Y; van der Steen AF; de Jong N; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Oct; 61(10):1661-7. PubMed ID: 25265175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Faster calcium recovery and membrane resealing in repeated sonoporation for delivery improvement.
Shi J; Han T; Yu ACH; Qin P
J Control Release; 2022 Dec; 352():385-398. PubMed ID: 36273528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Cell Line Phenotype Affects Sonoporation Efficiency Under Optimal Ultrasound Microbubble Conditions.
Qu N; Shi D; Shang M; Duan S; Guo L; Ning S; Li J
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Dec; 24():9054-9062. PubMed ID: 30546004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.
Shapiro G; Wong AW; Bez M; Yang F; Tam S; Even L; Sheyn D; Ben-David S; Tawackoli W; Pelled G; Ferrara KW; Gazit D
J Control Release; 2016 Feb; 223():157-164. PubMed ID: 26682505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation.
Helfield B; Chen X; Watkins SC; Villanueva FS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Sep; 113(36):9983-8. PubMed ID: 27551081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
