202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32659354)
1. On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG.
Andersen LM; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Riaz B; Winkler D; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117157. PubMed ID: 32659354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings.
Andersen LM; Oostenveld R; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0178602. PubMed ID: 28742118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking for On-Scalp MEG Sensors.
Xie M; Schneiderman JF; Chukharkin ML; Kalabukhov A; Riaz B; Lundqvist D; Whitmarsh S; Hamalainen M; Jousmaki V; Oostenveld R; Winkler D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jun; 64(6):1270-1276. PubMed ID: 28541190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scalp attached tangential magnetoencephalography using tunnel magneto-resistive sensors.
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Oogane M; Fujiwara K; Nakano T; Arimoto T; Matsuzaki H; Ando Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6106. PubMed ID: 35414691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-scalp MEG sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration.
Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Andersen LM; Kalabukhov A; Winkler D; Oostenveld R; Lundqvist D; Schneiderman JF
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 212():116686. PubMed ID: 32119981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of interictal epileptiform discharges: A comparison of on-scalp MEG and conventional MEG measurements.
Westin K; Pfeiffer C; Andersen LM; Ruffieux S; Cooray G; Kalaboukhov A; Winkler D; Ingvar M; Schneiderman J; Lundqvist D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 131(8):1711-1720. PubMed ID: 32504930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the limits of MEG spatial resolution with multipolar expansions.
Wens V
Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 270():119953. PubMed ID: 36842521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential of on-scalp MEG: Robust detection of human visual gamma-band responses.
Iivanainen J; Zetter R; Parkkonen L
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jan; 41(1):150-161. PubMed ID: 31571310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-trial classification of evoked responses to auditory tones using OPM- and SQUID-MEG.
Iivanainen J; Carter TR; Trumbo MCS; McKay J; Taulu S; Wang J; Stephen JM; Schwindt PDD; Borna A
J Neural Eng; 2023 Oct; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 37748476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of neuromagnetic brain function in pre-school children with custom sized MEG.
Tesan G; Johnson BW; Reid M; Thornton R; Crain S
J Vis Exp; 2010 Feb; (36):. PubMed ID: 20173730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetoencephalography for clinical pediatrics: the effect of head positioning on measurement of somatosensory-evoked fields.
Gaetz W; Otsubo H; Pang EW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 119(8):1923-1933. PubMed ID: 18579439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical Co-registration of MRI and On-scalp MEG.
Zetter R; Iivanainen J; Parkkonen L
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5490. PubMed ID: 30940844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Localizing on-scalp MEG sensors using an array of magnetic dipole coils.
Pfeiffer C; Andersen LM; Lundqvist D; Hämäläinen M; Schneiderman JF; Oostenveld R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0191111. PubMed ID: 29746486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing MEG and high-density EEG for intrinsic functional connectivity mapping.
Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Destoky F; Roshchupkina L; Bourguignon M; Goldman S; Peigneux P; Wens V
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116556. PubMed ID: 31972279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined MEG and EEG methodology for non-invasive recording of infraslow activity in the human cortex.
Leistner S; Sander T; Burghoff M; Curio G; Trahms L; Mackert BM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2774-80. PubMed ID: 17905653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
