202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32659354)
21. Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays.
Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():542-553. PubMed ID: 28007515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Non-Invasive Functional-Brain-Imaging with an OPM-based Magnetoencephalography System.
Borna A; Carter TR; Colombo AP; Jau YY; McKay J; Weisend M; Taulu S; Stephen JM; Schwindt PDD
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227684. PubMed ID: 31978102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Beginnings of the Development of Magnetoencephalography Systems Using Superconducting and Spintronics Sensors].
Nakasato N
Brain Nerve; 2022 Nov; 74(11):1295-1301. PubMed ID: 36343935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A 7-Channel High-[Formula: see text] SQUID-Based On-Scalp MEG System.
Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Jonsson L; Chukharkin ML; Kalaboukhov A; Xie M; Winkler D; Schneiderman JF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 May; 67(5):1483-1489. PubMed ID: 31484107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Requirements for Coregistration Accuracy in On-Scalp MEG.
Zetter R; Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):931-948. PubMed ID: 29934728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting stimulus-rate sensitivity of human somatosensory fMRI signals with MEG.
Nangini C; Hlushchuk Y; Hari R
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19378275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. From cryogenic to on-scalp magnetoencephalography for the evaluation of paediatric epilepsy.
Feys O; De Tiège X
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2024 Mar; 66(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 37421175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.
Zumer JM; Nagarajan SS; Krubitzer LA; Zhu Z; Turner RS; Disbrow EA
Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():110-24. PubMed ID: 20493828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Somatosensory cortical plasticity after toe-to-index transfer.
Hadoush H; Sunagawa T; Nakanishi K; Ochi M
Neuroreport; 2012 Dec; 23(17):1000-5. PubMed ID: 23044495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of somatosensory cortical processing in extremely preterm infants at term with MEG and EEG.
Nevalainen P; Rahkonen P; Pihko E; Lano A; Vanhatalo S; Andersson S; Autti T; Valanne L; Metsäranta M; Lauronen L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 126(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 25037653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Similarities between simulated spatial spectra of scalp EEG, MEG and structural MRI.
Ramon C; Freeman WJ; Holmes M; Ishimaru A; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH; Rezvanian E
Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19557510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpreting abnormality: an EEG and MEG study of P50 and the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm.
Edgar JC; Huang MX; Weisend MP; Sherwood A; Miller GA; Adler LE; Cañive JM
Biol Psychol; 2003 Dec; 65(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 14638286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetoencephalography for localizing and characterizing the epileptic focus.
Burgess RC
Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():203-214. PubMed ID: 31277848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On-Scalp Optically Pumped Magnetometers versus Cryogenic Magnetoencephalography for Diagnostic Evaluation of Epilepsy in School-aged Children.
Feys O; Corvilain P; Aeby A; Sculier C; Holmes N; Brookes M; Goldman S; Wens V; De Tiège X
Radiology; 2022 Aug; 304(2):429-434. PubMed ID: 35503013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Focal magnetoencephalographic spikes in the superior temporal plane undetected by scalp EEG.
Iwasaki M; Nakasato N; Shamoto H; Yoshimoto T
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Mar; 10(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 12637058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
