These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32659354)

  • 81. Virtual MEG Helmet: Computer Simulation of an Approach to Neuromagnetic Field Sampling.
    Medvedovsky M; Nenonen J; Koptelova A; Butorina A; Paetau R; Mäkelä JP; Ahonen A; Simola J; Gazit T; Taulu S
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Mar; 20(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 25616085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Recognizing and Correcting MEG Artifacts.
    Burgess RC
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Nov; 37(6):508-517. PubMed ID: 33165224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. The saccadic spike artifact in MEG.
    Carl C; Açık A; König P; Engel AK; Hipp JF
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1657-67. PubMed ID: 21963912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Variability and bias between magnetoencephalography systems in non-invasive localization of the primary somatosensory cortex.
    Bardouille T; Power L; Lalancette M; Bishop R; Beyea S; Taylor MJ; Dunkley BT
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 171():63-69. PubMed ID: 29843072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Giant early components of somatosensory evoked potentials to tibial nerve stimulation in cortical myoclonus.
    Anzellotti F; Onofrj M; Bonanni L; Saracino A; Franciotti R
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 12():212-8. PubMed ID: 27489768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study.
    Kida T; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():373-384. PubMed ID: 29936309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and other neurophysiological investigations.
    Paetau R; Mohamed IS
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 111():461-5. PubMed ID: 23622195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comparison of EEG and MEG in source localization of induced human gamma-band oscillations during visual stimulus.
    Mideksa KG; Hoogenboom N; Hellriegel H; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():8119-22. PubMed ID: 26738178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Feasibility and reproducibility of electroencephalography-based corticokinematic coherence.
    Piitulainen H; Illman M; Jousmäki V; Bourguignon M
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1959-1967. PubMed ID: 33112711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity.
    Rossini PM; Dal Forno G
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2004 Feb; 15(1):263-306. PubMed ID: 15029909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Argos 500: operation of a helmet vector-MEG.
    Pasquarelli A; Rossi R; De Melis M; Marzetti L; Trebeschi A; Müller HP; Erné SN
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():97. PubMed ID: 16012694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. MEG and EEG in epilepsy.
    Barkley GL; Baumgartner C
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(3):163-78. PubMed ID: 12881663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Spatiotemporal Accuracy of Gradient Magnetic-Field Topography (GMFT) Confirmed by Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Intracranial Electroencephalography Recordings in Patients with Intractable Epilepsy.
    Shirozu H; Hashizume A; Masuda H; Fukuda M; Ito Y; Nakayama Y; Higashijima T; Kameyama S
    Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():65. PubMed ID: 27594827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Two dimensional inverse imaging (2DII) of current sources in magnetoencephalography.
    Moran JE; Tepley N
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(3):201-17. PubMed ID: 10791683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Information content with low- vs. high-T(c) SQUID arrays in MEG recordings: the case for high-T(c) SQUID-based MEG.
    Schneiderman JF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():42-6. PubMed ID: 24184856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. High-resolution EEG (HR-EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).
    Gavaret M; Maillard L; Jung J
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2015 Mar; 45(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 25648821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Experimental study of the discrimination of two signal sources in the brain by three-dimensional vector magnetic field measurement of a magnetoencephalogram.
    Muluaka M; Uchikawa Y; Kotani M; Yamashita Y
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1997; 8(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 9083799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy.
    Baumgartner C; Pataraia E; Lindinger G; Deecke L
    Epilepsia; 2000; 41 Suppl 3():S39-47. PubMed ID: 11001335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.