These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32660453)

  • 1. The effectiveness of an actuator-driven pulsed water jet for the removal of artificial dental calculus: a preliminary study.
    Sato Y; Iikubo M; Nishioka T; Yoda N; Kusunoki T; Nakagawa A; Sasaki K; Tominaga T
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):205. PubMed ID: 32660453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of an actuator-driven pulsed water jet for removal of softened carious dentin.
    Yokoyama-Sato Y; Nishioka T; Naganuma Y; Takahashi M; Nakagawa A; Yoda N; Sasaki K; Takahashi N; Tominaga T; Iikubo M
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Jul; 41(4):527-533. PubMed ID: 35264543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
    Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes in the enamel surface after calculus removal].
    Plagmann HC; Wartenberg M; Kocher T
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Apr; 44(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 2702166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scaling.
    Aoki A; Miura M; Akiyama F; Nakagawa N; Tanaka J; Oda S; Watanabe H; Ishikawa I
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Oct; 35(5):266-77. PubMed ID: 11005154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
    Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology.
    Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ;
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
    Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventricle wall dissection and vascular preservation with the pulsed water jet device: novel tissue dissector for flexible neuroendoscopic surgery.
    Kawaguchi T; Nakagawa A; Endo T; Fujimura M; Sonoda Y; Tominaga T
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 124(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 26406794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total calculus removal: an attainable objective?
    Kepic TJ; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 2179511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal.
    Rabbani GM; Ash MM; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 7014822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [REM and Hommel tester studies of the dental enamel surfaces after removal of dental calculus with 2 different scalers].
    Lässig HE; Leidig A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1976 Dec; 31(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 793835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.