These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32660584)

  • 1. Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values.
    Maredupaka S; Meshram P; Chatte M; Kim WH; Kim TK
    Knee Surg Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 32(1):19. PubMed ID: 32660584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Gerhart CRB; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 36200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Khow YZ; Liow MHL; Goh GS; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
    Knee; 2021 Oct; 32():211-217. PubMed ID: 34509827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Orthopaedic Literature, Part II: Lower Extremity: A Systematic Review.
    Copay AG; Eyberg B; Chung AS; Zurcher KS; Chutkan N; Spangehl MJ
    JBJS Rev; 2018 Sep; 6(9):e2. PubMed ID: 30179898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods.
    Franceschini M; Boffa A; Pignotti E; Andriolo L; Zaffagnini S; Filardo G
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Mar; 51(4):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 36811558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Lee WC; Kwan YH; Chong HC; Yeo SJ
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3354-3359. PubMed ID: 27324635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.
    MacKay C; Clements N; Wong R; Davis AM
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1408-1419. PubMed ID: 31096046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Womac Osteoarthritis Index after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
    Longo UG; Papalia R; Campi S; De Salvatore S; Piergentili I; Bandini B; Lalli A; Denaro V
    J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 38137685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The minimum clinically important difference for the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Score (2011KSS) after total knee arthroplasty.
    Nishitani K; Yamamoto Y; Furu M; Kuriyama S; Nakamura S; Ito H; Fukuhara S; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1053-1057. PubMed ID: 31543424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review.
    Çelik D; Çoban Ö; Kılıçoğlu Ö
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():44-57. PubMed ID: 31078576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
    Sedaghat AR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):551-560. PubMed ID: 31159641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimal Clinically Important Difference as Applied in Rheumatology: An OMERACT Rasch Working Group Systematic Review and Critique.
    Doganay Erdogan B; Leung YY; Pohl C; Tennant A; Conaghan PG
    J Rheumatol; 2016 Jan; 43(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 26034156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Function Affects Ability to Achieve One-Year Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Albright P; Huyke-Hernández FA; Ormseth A; Doxey SA; Banks E; Only AJ; Horst PK; Cunningham BP
    Arthroplast Today; 2024 Jun; 27():101377. PubMed ID: 38654887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review.
    Jayadevappa R; Cook R; Chhatre S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():188-198. PubMed ID: 28676426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar postoperative patient-reported outcome in both second generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
    Bunyoz KI; Lustig S; Troelsen A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2226-2237. PubMed ID: 30264243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Orthopaedic Literature, Part I: Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review.
    Copay AG; Chung AS; Eyberg B; Olmscheid N; Chutkan N; Spangehl MJ
    JBJS Rev; 2018 Sep; 6(9):e1. PubMed ID: 30179897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes Over a Decade in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Goldberg B; Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Arthroplast Today; 2023 Apr; 20():101096. PubMed ID: 36923058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.