These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32660711)

  • 1. Author's response to the letter about the article: Hearing screenings for pre-school children: A comparison between whispered voice and pure tone audiogram tests.
    Skoloudik L; Mejzlik J; Chrobok V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110199. PubMed ID: 32660711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing screenings for preschool children: A comparison between whispered voice and pure tone audiogram tests.
    Skoloudik L; Mejzlik J; Janouch M; Drsata J; Vodicka J; Chrobok V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 130():109798. PubMed ID: 31838332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the hearing level of schoolchildren: comparison of several currently used screening techniques.
    Skurr BA; Jones DL
    Med J Aust; 1981 Sep; 2(5):248-9. PubMed ID: 7300745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical role of free-field voice tests in children.
    Dempster JH; Mackenzie K
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Feb; 17(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 1555319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure tone audiometry and whispered voice test. Conformities and differences in tests results.
    Groen JJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1973; 35(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 4795630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A directly comparative two-gate case-control diagnostic accuracy study of the pure tone screen and HearCheck screener tests for identifying hearing impairment in school children.
    Ukoumunne OC; Hyde C; Ozolins M; Zhelev Z; Errington S; Taylor RS; Benton C; Moody J; Cocking L; Watson J; Fortnum H
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e017258. PubMed ID: 28701413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school.
    Lancaster P; Krumm M; Ribera J; Klich R
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18840705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conductive hearing loss assessment in children with otitis media with effusion. A comparison of pure tone and BERA results.
    Conijn EA; Van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; Van Zanten GA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Apr; 14(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 2721010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench J
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
    Denys S; Hofmann M; Luts H; Guérin C; Keymeulen A; Van Hoeck K; van Wieringen A; Hoppenbrouwers K; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population.
    Sabo MP; Winston R; Macias JD
    Am J Otol; 2000 Jan; 21(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 10651440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
    Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of speech audiometry and pure tone audiometry in patients with secretory otitis media.
    Pringle MB; Thompson A; Reddy K
    J Laryngol Otol; 1993 Sep; 107(9):787-9. PubMed ID: 8228591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple screening test for hearing impairment in elderly patients.
    Macphee GJ; Crowther JA; McAlpine CH
    Age Ageing; 1988 Sep; 17(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 3068972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Value of preliminary hearing tests].
    Reiss M; Reiss G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2003; 153(3-4):73-5. PubMed ID: 12658966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Screening for hearing disorders in school children of Medellin, Colombia, 1993].
    Rodríguez MA; Melguizo-Yepez M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1994; 36(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 7892643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pure tone audiometry and impedance screening of school entrant children by nurses: evaluation in a practical setting.
    Holtby I; Forster DP; Kumar U
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Dec; 51(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 9519138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pseudohypacusis in children: circumstances and diagnostic strategy.
    Drouillard M; Petroff N; Majer J; Perrot C; Quesnel S; François M;
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1632-6. PubMed ID: 25112166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of transient evoked otoacoustic emission testing in 6-year-old school children: a comparison with pure tone screening and tympanometry.
    Driscoll C; Kei J; McPherson B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 57(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 11165644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Free voice and pure tone audiometer for routine testing of auditory acuity; studies on comparative efficiency.
    HARRIS JD
    Arch Otolaryngol (1925); 1946 Oct; 44(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 21002091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.