237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32660827)
1. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Gooderham N; Kasper P; Lynch A; Morita T; Ouedraogo G; Parra Morte JM; Pfuhler S; Rogiers V; Schulz M; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; Worth A; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():55-68. PubMed ID: 25435356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the performance of TIMES genotoxicity models with EFSA pesticide data.
Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Honma M; Yamada T; Kaloyanova E; Mekenyan OG
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 30445516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corrigendum to "EURL ECVAM genotoxicity and carcinogenicity database of substances eliciting negative results in the Ames test: Construction of the database" [Mutat. Res. 854-855 June-July (2020) 503199].
Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 858-860():503274. PubMed ID: 33198940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up genotoxicity assessment of Ames-positive/equivocal chemicals using the improved thymidine kinase gene mutation assay in DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells.
Sassa A; Fukuda T; Ukai A; Nakamura M; Sato R; Fujiwara S; Hirota K; Takeda S; Sugiyama KI; Honma M; Yasui M
Mutagenesis; 2021 Oct; 36(5):331-338. PubMed ID: 34216473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.
Reifferscheid G; Heil J
Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):129-45. PubMed ID: 8792833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data-based review of QSARs for predicting genotoxicity: the state of the art.
Benigni R; Bossa C
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 30260416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.
Qu M; Xu H; Li W; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xu B; Li Z; Liu T; Guo L; Xie J
Arch Toxicol; 2021 Nov; 95(11):3559-3573. PubMed ID: 34510228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of bronchodilators and antiasthma drugs.
Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Robbiano L; Martelli A
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2013 May; 112(5):302-13. PubMed ID: 23374861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity.
Kamber M; Flückiger-Isler S; Engelhardt G; Jaeckh R; Zeiger E
Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 19447896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
