These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32660981)

  • 1. TRACE: transcription factor footprinting using chromatin accessibility data and DNA sequence.
    Ouyang N; Boyle AP
    Genome Res; 2020 Jul; 30(7):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 32660981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection.
    Yardımcı GG; Frank CL; Crawford GE; Ohler U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Oct; 42(19):11865-78. PubMed ID: 25294828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. XL-DNase-seq: improved footprinting of dynamic transcription factors.
    Oh KS; Ha J; Baek S; Sung MH
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2019 Jun; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 31164146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments.
    Gusmao EG; Allhoff M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Nat Methods; 2016 Apr; 13(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 26901649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity.
    Baek S; Goldstein I; Hager GL
    Cell Rep; 2017 May; 19(8):1710-1722. PubMed ID: 28538187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducible inference of transcription factor footprints in ATAC-seq and DNase-seq datasets using protocol-specific bias modeling.
    Karabacak Calviello A; Hirsekorn A; Wurmus R; Yusuf D; Ohler U
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 30791920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.
    Quach B; Furey TS
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):956-963. PubMed ID: 27993786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. XL-DNase-Seq: Footprinting Analysis of Dynamic Transcription Factors.
    Oh KS; Aqdas M; Sung MH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2846():243-261. PubMed ID: 39141240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular and structural considerations of TF-DNA binding for the generation of biologically meaningful and accurate phylogenetic footprinting analysis: the LysR-type transcriptional regulator family as a study model.
    Oliver P; Peralta-Gil M; Tabche ML; Merino E
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):686. PubMed ID: 27567672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data.
    Piper J; Elze MC; Cauchy P; Cockerill PN; Bonifer C; Ott S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Nov; 41(21):e201. PubMed ID: 24071585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
    Mathelier A; Wasserman WW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(9):e1003214. PubMed ID: 24039567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic Footprinting Analyses from DNase-seq Data to Construct Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Moyano TC; Gutiérrez RA; Alvarez JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2328():25-46. PubMed ID: 34251618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncovering uncharacterized binding of transcription factors from ATAC-seq footprinting data.
    Schultheis H; Bentsen M; Heger V; Looso M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9275. PubMed ID: 38654130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The native cistrome and sequence motif families of the maize ear.
    Savadel SD; Hartwig T; Turpin ZM; Vera DL; Lung PY; Sui X; Blank M; Frommer WB; Dennis JH; Zhang J; Bass HW
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009689. PubMed ID: 34383745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mocap: large-scale inference of transcription factor binding sites from chromatin accessibility.
    Chen X; Yu B; Carriero N; Silva C; Bonneau R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 May; 45(8):4315-4329. PubMed ID: 28334916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq.
    Li Z; Schulz MH; Look T; Begemann M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 30808370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of co-occurring transcription factor binding sites from DNA sequence using clustered position weight matrices.
    Oh YM; Kim JK; Choi S; Yoo JY
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Mar; 40(5):e38. PubMed ID: 22187154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.