These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32661574)

  • 1. Which type of method shows the best mechanical behavior for internal fixation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements with clockwise rotation? Comparison of four methods.
    de Carvalho PHM; Oliveira SDS; Favaro M; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Mar; 25(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 32661574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.
    de Assis GM; Dos Santos VDB; Queiroz SIML; Germano AR
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 35001178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    da Silva Oliveira S; de Carvalho PHM; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):633-639. PubMed ID: 35022847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
    Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
    Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
    Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis in mandibular advancement and occlusal plane rotation with finite element analysis.
    da Silveira MLM; de Oliveira Bueno ML; da Silva JSP; Germano AR
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):362-367. PubMed ID: 33358030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis.
    Ergezen Ozasir E; Tosun E; Tuz HH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):652-657. PubMed ID: 32068168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.
    Olivera LB; Sant' Ana E; Manzato AJ; Guerra FL; Arnett GW
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 23032203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the effect of an additional L-shaped plate on straight or box plate fixation in sagittal split ramus osteotomy using a bioabsorbable plate system.
    Matsushita K; Inoue N; Totsuka Y
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 15(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 21374071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
    Oh JS; Kim SG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy among mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation using absorbable plates and screws.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 28011183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.