These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32661574)

  • 21. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
    De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
    Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.
    Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
    Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.
    Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.
    Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tharanon W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Sep; 56(9):1055-8. PubMed ID: 9734767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods].
    Yin XM; Zhang JW; Ren XX; Xu GX; Liu X
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Jun; 22(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 23852049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
    Chuong CJ; Borotikar B; Schwartz-Dabney C; Sinn DP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of different osteosynthesis methods after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements.
    Klein GBG; Mendes GCB; Ribeiro Junior PD; Viswanath A; Papageorge M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 28633929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of overlapped cortical bone area after modified plate fixation with bent plate in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Nakano Y; Higuchi M; Nakazawa R; Ikawa H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e210-6. PubMed ID: 24095217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
    Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
    Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Murphy MT; Haug RH; Barber JE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 May; 55(5):489-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 9146519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of bicortical, miniplate and hybrid fixation techniques in mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation: A finite element analysis study.
    Can S; Basa S; Varol A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e7-e14. PubMed ID: 33848666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.