285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32662189)
1. Comparison of the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (iRECIST) with RECIST for capturing treatment response of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.
Fukuokaya W; Kimura T; Yanagisawa T; Kimura S; Tsuzuki S; Koike Y; Iwamoto Y; Enei Y; Tanaka M; Urabe F; Onuma H; Honda M; Miki J; Oyama Y; Abe H; Egawa S
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 32662189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical benefit of continuing pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Fukuokaya W; Kimura T; Yanagisawa T; Kimura S; Tsuzuki S; Koike Y; Iwamoto Y; Enei Y; Tanaka M; Urabe F; Onuma H; Honda M; Miki J; Oyama Y; Abe H; Egawa S
Cancer Immunol Immunother; 2022 Jan; 71(1):229-236. PubMed ID: 34100985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of iRECIST versus RECIST V.1.1 in patients treated with an anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody: pooled FDA analysis.
Mulkey F; Theoret MR; Keegan P; Pazdur R; Sridhara R
J Immunother Cancer; 2020 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32107275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Radiological Tumor Response Based on iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Therapy.
Zheng B; Shin JH; Li H; Chen Y; Guo Y; Wang M
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 22(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 33289356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in advanced melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab in a phase II clinical trial.
Ahmed FS; Dercle L; Goldmacher GV; Yang H; Connors D; Tang Y; Karovic S; Zhao B; Carvajal RD; Robert C; Maitland ML; Oxnard GR; Schwartz LH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1853-1862. PubMed ID: 32995974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pembrolizumab as First-line Therapy in Cisplatin-ineligible Advanced Urothelial Cancer (KEYNOTE-052): Outcomes in Older Patients by Age and Performance Status.
Grivas P; Plimack ER; Balar AV; Castellano D; O'Donnell PH; Bellmunt J; Powles T; Hahn NM; de Wit R; Bajorin DF; Ellison MC; Frenkl TL; Godwin JL; Vuky J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 32423837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between comorbidities and survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.
Hashimoto M; Fukuokaya W; Yanagisawa T; Yamamoto S; Koike Y; Imai Y; Iwatani K; Onuma H; Ito K; Urabe F; Tsuzuki S; Kimura S; Oyama Y; Abe H; Miki J; Kimura T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 29(5):612-619. PubMed ID: 38430304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Favorable Response of Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma with Only Small Lesions to not be Considered Measurable by RECIST.
Kadono Y; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Kamijima T; Seto C; Takano A; Yotsuyanagi S; Nakagawa R; Miyagi T; Aoyama S; Asahi H; Fukuda R; Mizokami A
Urol J; 2021 Dec; 19(3):202-208. PubMed ID: 34927229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of response in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of the RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria.
Liang H; Xu Y; Chen M; Zhong W; Wang M; Zhao J
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Apr; 11(4):1068-1075. PubMed ID: 32129934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of RECIST, iRECIST, and PERCIST for the Evaluation of Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Beer L; Hochmair M; Haug AR; Schwabel B; Kifjak D; Wadsak W; Fuereder T; Fabikan H; Fazekas A; Schwab S; Mayerhoefer ME; Herold C; Prosch H
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 44(7):535-543. PubMed ID: 31021918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response evaluation for immunotherapy through semi-automatic software based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, and iRECIST criteria: comparison with subjective assessment.
Lai YC; Chang WC; Chen CB; Wang CL; Lin YF; Ho MM; Cheng CY; Huang PW; Hsu CW; Lin G
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):983-991. PubMed ID: 31739675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria.
Tazdait M; Mezquita L; Lahmar J; Ferrara R; Bidault F; Ammari S; Balleyguier C; Planchard D; Gazzah A; Soria JC; Marabelle A; Besse B; Caramella C
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():38-47. PubMed ID: 29182990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of RECIST and iRECIST criteria in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with nivolumab.
Singla R; Jajodia A; Agrawal RK; Rao A; Pasricha S; Batra U
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(5):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 37787285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial.
Nishiyama H; Yamamoto Y; Sassa N; Nishimura K; Fujimoto K; Fukasawa S; Yokoyama M; Enokida H; Takahashi K; Tanaka Y; Imai K; Shimamoto T; Perini R; Frenkl T; Bajorin D; Bellmunt J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 31729625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Sundahl N; Rottey S; De Maeseneer D; Ost P
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Feb; 18(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 29284318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness and safety profile of pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial cancer: A retrospective single-center analysis in Japan.
Fujiwara M; Yuasa T; Urasaki T; Komai Y; Fujiwara R; Numao N; Yamamoto S; Yonese J
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Dec; 4(6):e1398. PubMed ID: 33934570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel biomarker for predicting clinical responses to pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients.
Ogihara K; Kikuchi E; Shigeta K; Okabe T; Hattori S; Yamashita R; Yoshimine S; Shirotake S; Nakazawa R; Matsumoto K; Mizuno R; Hara S; Oyama M; Masuda T; Niwakawa M; Oya M
Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):602.e1-602.e10. PubMed ID: 32139290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States.
Criss SD; Weaver DT; Sheehan DF; Lee RJ; Pandharipande PV; Kong CY
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):180.e11-180.e18. PubMed ID: 30528699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST for Response Evaluation in Solid Tumours].
Houdek Š; Büchler T; Kindlová E
Klin Onkol; 2017; 30(Supplementum3):32-39. PubMed ID: 29239190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
