210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32663900)
1. Abdominoperineal excision in Australasia: clinical outcomes, predictive factors and recent trends of nonrestorative rectal cancer surgery.
Smith N; Waters PS; Peacock O; Kong JC; Lynch AC; McCormick JJ; Heriot A; Warrier SK
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1614-1625. PubMed ID: 32663900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study.
Warrier SK; Kong JC; Guerra GR; Chittleborough TJ; Naik A; Ramsay RG; Lynch AC; Heriot AG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 29521824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is extralevator abdominoperineal resection necessary for low rectal carcinoma in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy era?
Güven HE; Aksel B
Acta Chir Belg; 2020 Oct; 120(5):334-340. PubMed ID: 31250735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Khan MAS; Ang CW; Hakeem AR; Scott N; Saunders RN; Botterill I
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 28924962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection in lower and middle rectal cancer.
Omidvari S; Hamedi SH; Mohammadianpanah M; Razzaghi S; Mosalaei A; Ahmadloo N; Ansari M; Pourahmad S
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2013 Sep; 25(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 23932752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits.
Detering R; Saraste D; de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; Dekker JWT; Wouters MWJM; van Geloven AAW; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; Martling A; Westerterp M;
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Apr; 22(4):416-429. PubMed ID: 31696599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of patients with abdominoperineal resection (APR) and low anterior resection (LAR) who had very low rectal cancer.
Yeom SS; Park IJ; Jung SW; Oh SH; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Lim SB; Kim N; Yu CS; Kim JC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(43):e8249. PubMed ID: 29068989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Kim JH; Kim TW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection.
Shihab OC; Brown G; Daniels IR; Heald RJ; Quirke P; Moran BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jan; 53(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20010351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there still a place for abdominoperineal resection of the rectum?
Glättli A; Barras JP; Metzger U
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1995 Feb; 21(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 7851543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center.
Nissan A; Guillem JG; Paty PB; Douglas Wong W; Minsky B; Saltz L; Cohen AM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):27-35; discussion 35-6. PubMed ID: 11805560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
Hiranyakas A; da Silva G; Wexner SD; Ho YH; Allende D; Berho M
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
