165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32664786)
1. A deliberative study of public attitudes towards sharing genomic data within NHS genomic medicine services in England.
Hassan L; Dalton A; Hammond C; Tully MP
Public Underst Sci; 2020 Oct; 29(7):702-717. PubMed ID: 32664786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: a qualitative study of healthcare providers in England.
Papageorgiou V; Wharton-Smith A; Campos-Matos I; Ward H
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e033202. PubMed ID: 32051313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.
Etchegary H; Darmonkov G; Simmonds C; Pullman D; Rahman P
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):81. PubMed ID: 37805493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals.
Dheensa S; Fenwick A; Lucassen A
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e012443. PubMed ID: 28159847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature review.
Shabani M; Bezuidenhout L; Borry P
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2014 Nov; 14(8):1053-65. PubMed ID: 25260013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Australian public perspectives on genomic data storage and sharing: Benefits, concerns and access preferences.
Lynch F; Meng Y; Best S; Goranitis I; Savulescu J; Gyngell C; Vears DF
Eur J Med Genet; 2023 Jan; 66(1):104676. PubMed ID: 36473622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients' family members.
Takashima K; Maru Y; Mori S; Mano H; Noda T; Muto K
BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):61. PubMed ID: 29914459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Media content analysis of general practitioners' reactions to care.data expressed in the media: what lessons can be learned for future NHS data-sharing initiatives?
Ford E; Kazempour Y; Cooper MJF; Katikireddi SV; Boyd A
BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e038006. PubMed ID: 32912990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research participants' attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information.
Jamal L; Sapp JC; Lewis K; Yanes T; Facio FM; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB
Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Aug; 22(8):964-8. PubMed ID: 24281371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.
Kalkman S; van Delden J; Banerjee A; Tyl B; Mostert M; van Thiel G
J Med Ethics; 2022 Jan; 48(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 31719155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding how to build a social licence for using novel linked datasets for planning and research in Kent, Surrey and Sussex: results of deliberative focus groups.
Ford E; Rees-Roberts M; Stanley K; Goddard K; Giles S; Armes J; Ikhile D; Madzvamuse A; Spencer-Hughes V; George A; Farmer C; Cassell J
Int J Popul Data Sci; 2020; 5(3):2114. PubMed ID: 37671318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimising Exome Prenatal Sequencing Services (EXPRESS): a study protocol to evaluate rapid prenatal exome sequencing in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service.
Hill M; Ellard S; Fisher J; Fulop N; Knight M; Kroese M; Ledger J; Leeson-Beevers K; McEwan A; McMullan D; Mellis R; Morris S; Parker M; Tapon D; Baple E; Blackburn L; Choudry A; Lafarge C; McInnes-Dean H; Peter M; Ramakrishnan R; Roberts L; Searle B; Smith E; Walton H; Wynn SL; Han Wu W; Chitty LS
NIHR Open Res; 2022; 2():10. PubMed ID: 35935673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 'Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes.
Haddow G; Bruce A; Sathanandam S; Wyatt JC
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 20629997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Context matters in genomic data sharing: a qualitative investigation into responses from the Australian public.
Warren V; Critchley C; McWhirter R; Walshe J; Nicol D
BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Apr; 15(Suppl 3):275. PubMed ID: 37005651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol.
Lewis C; Buchanan J; Clarke A; Clement E; Friedrich B; Hastings-Ward J; Hill M; Horn R; Lucassen AM; Patch C; Pickard A; Roberts L; Sanderson SC; Wynn SL; Vindrola-Padros C; Lakhanpaul M
NIHR Open Res; 2021; 1():23. PubMed ID: 35098132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imagining genomic medicine futures in primary care: General practitioners' views on mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service.
Mwale S; Farsides B
Sociol Health Illn; 2021 Nov; 43(9):2121-2140. PubMed ID: 34773708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sharing genomic data from clinical testing with researchers: public survey of expectations of clinical genomic data management in Queensland, Australia.
Vidgen ME; Kaladharan S; Malacova E; Hurst C; Waddell N
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):119. PubMed ID: 33213438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.
Long-Sutehall T; Bracher M; Mollart S; Wale J
Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2023 Nov; 11(20):1-159. PubMed ID: 37929829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
