These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32664814)
1. Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients. Warren SE; Noelle Dunbar M; Bosworth C; Agrawal S Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):323-337. PubMed ID: 32664814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated Bimodal Fitting for Unilateral CI Users with Residual Contralateral Hearing. Auletta G; Franzè A; Laria C; Piccolo C; Papa C; Riccardi P; Pisani D; Sarnelli A; Del Vecchio V; Malesci R; Marciano E Audiol Res; 2021 May; 11(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 34065802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients. Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners. Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report. Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY; Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users. Langerak NC; Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 38447538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit. Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study. Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing. Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to Optimally Fit a Hearing Aid for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review. Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 29688963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Language and speech perception of young children with bimodal fitting or bilateral cochlear implants. Ching TY; Day J; Van Buynder P; Hou S; Zhang V; Seeto M; Burns L; Flynn C Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1(0 1):S43-6. PubMed ID: 24869442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm. Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation. Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors. Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]