These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32665691)

  • 1. Prediction of breeding values for group-recorded traits including genomic information and an individually recorded correlated trait.
    Ma X; Christensen OF; Gao H; Huang R; Nielsen B; Madsen P; Jensen J; Ostersen T; Li P; Shirali M; Su G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Jan; 126(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 32665691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen B; Ostersen T; Shirali M; Jensen J; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Aug; 50(1):42. PubMed ID: 30107792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.
    Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 36637041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic parameters and genomic prediction for feed intake recorded at the group and individual level in different production systems for growing pigs.
    Gao H; Su G; Jensen J; Madsen P; Christensen OF; Ask B; Poulsen BG; Ostersen T; Nielsen B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Apr; 53(1):33. PubMed ID: 33832423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.
    Negussie E; Mehtiö T; Mäntysaari P; Løvendahl P; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7248-7262. PubMed ID: 31155258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of predictor traits on accuracy of genomic breeding values for feed intake based on a limited cow reference population.
    Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Wall E; Strabel T; Calus MP
    Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1759-68. PubMed ID: 23915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Possibilities to improve the genetic evaluation of a rare breed using limited genomic information and multivariate BLUP.
    Pollott GE; Charlesworth A; Wathes DC
    Animal; 2014 May; 8(5):685-94. PubMed ID: 24739347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats.
    Massender E; Brito LF; Maignel L; Oliveira HR; Jafarikia M; Baes CF; Sullivan B; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2393-2407. PubMed ID: 34998569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving genetic evaluation using a multitrait single-step genomic model for ability to resume cycling after calving, measured by activity tags in Holstein cows.
    Ismael A; Løvendahl P; Fogh A; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Oct; 100(10):8188-8196. PubMed ID: 28780110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Komen H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):64. PubMed ID: 31730478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models.
    Guo G; Zhao F; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Du L; Su G
    BMC Genet; 2014 Mar; 15():30. PubMed ID: 24593261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving accuracy of bulls' predicted genomic breeding values for fertility using daughters' milk progesterone profiles.
    Tenghe AMM; Bouwman AC; Berglund B; de Koning DJ; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5177-5193. PubMed ID: 29525306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.