These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32665802)

  • 1. Handle-Hand Compatibility Effects for the Right and Left Hand Using Reach-to-Touch Movements.
    Garofalo G; Mussi DR; Riggio L
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2020; 16(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 32665802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2605-2613. PubMed ID: 31066635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?
    Iani C; Ferraro L; Maiorana NV; Gallese V; Rubichi S
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1363-1374. PubMed ID: 29627857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Too much to handle? Interference from distractors with similar affordances on target selection for handled objects.
    Haddad L; Wamain Y; Kalénine S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290226. PubMed ID: 37643170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.
    Pellicano A; Binkofski F
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 32036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect.
    Azaad S; Laham SM; Shields P
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():105-127. PubMed ID: 31071502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.
    Demir P; Sandıkçı M; Demir E; Soyman E
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Nov; 115(4):787-808. PubMed ID: 39096300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.
    Wilf M; Holmes NP; Schwartz I; Makin TR
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():591. PubMed ID: 24027552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alignment effects in beer mugs: Automatic action activation or response competition?
    Roest SA; Pecher D; Naeije L; Zeelenberg R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1665-80. PubMed ID: 27184058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report.
    Warman A; Clark A; Malcolm GL; Havekost M; Rossit S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; ():17470218241230812. PubMed ID: 38279528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.
    Pellicano A; Lugli L; Binkofski F; Rubichi S; Iani C; Nicoletti R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1383-1399. PubMed ID: 29651534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pixel asymmetry predicts between-object differences in the object-based compatibility effect.
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2376-2388. PubMed ID: 32705950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction.
    Pellicano A; Koch I; Binkofski F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1647-1666. PubMed ID: 28414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the Role of Action Consequences in the Handle-Response Compatibility Effect.
    Scerrati E; D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Iani C; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():286. PubMed ID: 32848666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of cognitive control and top-down processes in object affordances.
    Ferguson TD; Bub DN; Masson MEJ; Krigolson OE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2017-2032. PubMed ID: 33772449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.