These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32665802)

  • 21. Acute immobilisation facilitates premotor preparatory activity for the non-restrained hand when facing grasp affordances.
    Kühn S; Werner A; Lindenberger U; Verrel J
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():69-73. PubMed ID: 24531050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of grasp compatibility in go/no-go and two-choice tasks.
    Pecher D; Roest S; Zeelenberg R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1076-1087. PubMed ID: 30830555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: silhouettes and photographs.
    Pappas Z
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):716-28. PubMed ID: 25306434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.
    Aoki T; Rivlis G; Schieber MH
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 115(2):858-67. PubMed ID: 26683065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects.
    Vainio L; Hammaren L; Hausen M; Rekolainen E; Riskila S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 21279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Object Affordances Potentiate Responses but Do Not Guide Attentional Prioritization.
    Yamani Y; Ariga A; Yamada Y
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2015; 9():74. PubMed ID: 26793077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Motor affordance for grasping a safety handle.
    McDannald DW; Mansour M; Rydalch G; Bolton DAE
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():131-137. PubMed ID: 29857040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Compatibility between object size and response side in grasping: the left hand prefers smaller objects, the right hand prefers larger objects.
    Seegelke C; Wühr P
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6026. PubMed ID: 30533312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects.
    Bub DN; Masson ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 20364923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Within grasp but out of reach: evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere.
    Johnson SH; Corballis PM; Gazzaniga MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 11115654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():287-91. PubMed ID: 26233530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of the action context in object affordance.
    Zhao L
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 29610980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference.
    Riddoch MJ; Edwards MG; Humphreys GW; West R; Heafield T
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 1998 Sep; 15(6-8):645-83. PubMed ID: 22448840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions.
    Cho DT; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 21500949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objects rapidly prime the motor system when located near the dominant hand.
    Rowe PJ; Haenschel C; Kosilo M; Yarrow K
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():102-108. PubMed ID: 28167410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use.
    Kunde W; Müsselar J; Heuer H
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 17702217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do my hands prime your hands? The hand-to-response correspondence effect.
    Scerrati E; Iani C; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103012. PubMed ID: 31981827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.