153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32666265)
1. Acquisition of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in a wayfinding task: in stages or in parallel?
Kim K; Bock O
Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):2098-2106. PubMed ID: 32666265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wayfinding and acquisition of spatial knowledge with navigation assistance.
Münzer S; Lörch L; Frankenstein J
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 31246054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the landmark-route-survey framework to evaluate spatial knowledge obtained from synthetic vision systems.
Lapeyre B; Hourlier S; Servantie X; N'Kaoua B; Sauzéon H
Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):647-61. PubMed ID: 22235527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using virtual environments to investigate wayfinding in 8- to 12-year-olds and adults.
Lingwood J; Blades M; Farran EK; Courbois Y; Matthews D
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():178-189. PubMed ID: 28941380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge during wayfinding.
He Q; McNamara TP; Bodenheimer B; Klippel A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1364-1386. PubMed ID: 30124310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Different "routes" to a cognitive map: dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning.
Zhang H; Zherdeva K; Ekstrom AD
Mem Cognit; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1106-17. PubMed ID: 24845757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the different domains of environmental knowledge acquired from virtual navigation and their relationship to cognitive factors and wayfinding inclinations.
Muffato V; Miola L; Pellegrini M; Pazzaglia F; Meneghetti C
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Aug; 8(1):50. PubMed ID: 37530868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of competing environmental variables and signage on route-choices in simulated everyday and emergency wayfinding situations.
Vilar E; Rebelo F; Noriega P; Duarte E; Mayhorn CB
Ergonomics; 2014; 57(4):511-24. PubMed ID: 24635043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks.
Jansen-Osmann P; Fuchs P
Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 16955726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal features of spatial knowledge: Representing order and duration of topographical information.
Teghil A; Boccia M; Bonavita A; Guariglia C
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112218. PubMed ID: 31499091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landmark and route knowledge in children's spatial representation of a virtual environment.
Nys M; Gyselinck V; Orriols E; Hickmann M
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1522. PubMed ID: 25667573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wayfinding in a virtual environment and Down syndrome: The impact of navigational aids.
N Kaoua B; Landuran A; Sauzéon H
Neuropsychology; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 31343239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic investigation of navigation impairment in chronic stroke patients: Evidence for three distinct types.
Claessen MHG; Visser-Meily JMA; Meilinger T; Postma A; de Rooij NK; van der Ham IJM
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():154-161. PubMed ID: 28684296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.
Brunyé TT; Wood MD; Houck LA; Taylor HA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 27156528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overcoming navigational challenges: A novel approach to the study and assessment of topographical orientation.
Bonavita A; Teghil A; Pesola MC; Guariglia C; D'Antonio F; Di Vita A; Boccia M
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):752-762. PubMed ID: 34346039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual navigation tested on a mobile app is predictive of real-world wayfinding navigation performance.
Coutrot A; Schmidt S; Coutrot L; Pittman J; Hong L; Wiener JM; Hölscher C; Dalton RC; Hornberger M; Spiers HJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213272. PubMed ID: 30883560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers.
Propper RE; Wolfarth A; Carlei C; Brunye TT; Christman SD
Laterality; 2019 May; 24(3):274-288. PubMed ID: 30040010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior.
de Condappa O; Wiener JM
Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 25537525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigation assistance: a trade-off between wayfinding support and configural learning support.
Münzer S; Zimmer HD; Baus J
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Mar; 18(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 22141461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
