These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer. Patriquin G; LeBlanc JJ; Williams C; Hatchette TF; Ross J; Barrett L; Davidson R Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0245521. PubMed ID: 35171010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Hitzenbichler F; Bauernfeind S; Salzberger B; Schmidt B; Wenzel JJ Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33920072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A combined oro-nasopharyngeal swab is more sensitive than mouthwash in detecting SARS-CoV-2 by a high-throughput PCR assay. Michel W; Färber J; Dilas M; Heuft HG; Tammer I; Baar J; Kaasch AJ Infection; 2021 Jun; 49(3):527-531. PubMed ID: 33738680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses. Laine M; Ahti J; Peltola V; Peri P; Hakanen AJ; Waris M Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0073621. PubMed ID: 34668741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-collection: An appropriate alternative during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Wehrhahn MC; Robson J; Brown S; Bursle E; Byrne S; New D; Chong S; Newcombe JP; Siversten T; Hadlow N J Clin Virol; 2020 Jul; 128():104417. PubMed ID: 32403007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Throat Swabs Performed With or Without Specimen Collection From the Tonsils: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Hartvigsen B; Jakobsen KK; Benfield T; Gredal NT; Ersbøll AK; Grønlund MW; Bundgaard H; Andersen MP; Steenhard N; von Buchwald C; Todsen T JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Jun; 13():e47446. PubMed ID: 38865190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting. Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage. Calame A; Mazza L; Renzoni A; Kaiser L; Schibler M Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 40(2):441-445. PubMed ID: 32939576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical strategies for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing in resource-constrained settings. Muller MS; Chhetri SB; Basham C; Rapp T; Lin FC; Lin K; Westreich D; Cerami C; Juliano JJ; Lin JT Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Oct; 101(2):115469. PubMed ID: 34280773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. Dogan OA; Kose B; Agaoglu NB; Yildiz J; Alkurt G; Demirkol YK; Irvem A; Doganay GD; Doganay L J Virol Methods; 2021 Apr; 290():114049. PubMed ID: 33387561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simple concentration method enables the use of gargle and mouthwash instead of nasopharyngeal swab sampling for the diagnosis of COVID-19 by PCR. Kocagoz T; Can O; Yurttutan Uyar N; Aksoy E; Polat T; Cankaya D; Karakus B; Mozioglu E; Kocagoz S Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Dec; 40(12):2617-2622. PubMed ID: 34448088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample collection and transport strategies to enhance yield, accessibility, and biosafety of COVID-19 RT-PCR testing. Banada P; Elson D; Daivaa N; Park C; Desind S; Montalvan I; Kwiatkowski R; Chakravorty S; Alland D; Xie YL J Med Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 70(9):. PubMed ID: 34486972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Multiplex Digital Droplet RT-PCR as a Diagnostic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva Samples. Cassinari K; Alessandri-Gradt E; Chambon P; Charbonnier F; Gracias S; Beaussire L; Alexandre K; Sarafan-Vasseur N; Houdayer C; Etienne M; Caron F; Plantier JC; Frebourg T Clin Chem; 2021 Apr; 67(5):736-741. PubMed ID: 33331864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Callahan C; Ditelberg S; Dutta S; Littlehale N; Cheng A; Kupczewski K; McVay D; Riedel S; Kirby JE; Arnaout R Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0016221. PubMed ID: 34406838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations. Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice. Sharma K; Aggarwala P; Gandhi D; Mathias A; Singh P; Sharma S; Negi SS; Bhargava A; Das P; Gaikwad U; Wankhede A; Behra A; Nagarkar NM PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249408. PubMed ID: 33819290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]