These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32667080)
1. Coronary revascularization during treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of the complete percutaneous approach (PCI plus TAVR) versus the complete surgical approach (CABG plus SAVR). Tarus A; Tinica G; Bacusca A; Artene B; Popa IV; Burlacu A J Card Surg; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2009-2016. PubMed ID: 32667080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sakurai Y; Yokoyama Y; Fukuhara S; Takagi H; Kuno T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 167(4):1305-1313.e9. PubMed ID: 36150940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures. Baumbach H; Schairer ER; Wachter K; Rustenbach C; Ahad S; Stan A; Hill S; Bramlage P; Franke UFW; Schäufele T BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 May; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 31088373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis. Ullah W; Sarvepalli D; Kumar A; Zahid S; Saleem S; Muhammadzai HZU; Khattak F; Block PC; Jaber WA; Shishehbor MH; Filby SJ; Devireddy C Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 37698396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic Stenosis With Coronary Artery Disease: SAVR or TAVR-When and How? Del Portillo JH; Farjat-Pasos J; Galhardo A; Avvedimento M; Mas-Peiro S; Mengi S; Nuche J; Mohammadi S; Rodés-Cabau J Can J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 40(2):218-234. PubMed ID: 37758014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous versus surgical approach to aortic valve replacement with coronary revascularization: A systematic review andmeta-analysis. Guo Y; Zhang W; Wu H Perfusion; 2024 Sep; 39(6):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 37224394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Abugroun A; Osman M; Awadalla S; Klein LW Am J Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 137():83-88. PubMed ID: 32991856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention versus surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kotronias RA; Bray JH; Scarsini R; Rajasundaram S; Terentes-Printzios D; De Maria GL; Kharbanda RK; Mamas MA; Bagur R; Banning AP Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(5):1113-1125. PubMed ID: 32662594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcatheter or surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: A comparative analysis from the Italian OBSERVANT study. Barbanti M; Buccheri S; Capodanno D; D'Errigo P; Ranucci M; Rosato S; Santoro G; Fusco D; Tamburino C; Biancari F; Seccareccia F; Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():102-106. PubMed ID: 29903519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. TransCatheter aortic valve implantation and fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting for treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis and multivessel or advanced coronary disease: The transcatheter valve and vessels trial (TCW trial): Design and rationale. Kedhi E; Rroku A; Hermanides RS; Dambrink JH; Singh S; Berg JT; van Ginkel DJ; Hudec M; Amoroso G; Amat-Santos IJ; Andreas M; Teles RC; Bonnet G; Van Belle E; Conradi L; van Garsse L; Wojakowski W; Voudris V; Sacha J; Cervinka P; Lipsic E; Somi S; Nombela-Franco L; Postma S; Piayda K; De Luca G; Malinofski K; Modine T Am Heart J; 2024 Apr; 270():86-94. PubMed ID: 38309610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-hospital outcomes following percutaneous versus surgical intervention in the treatment of aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease. McInerney A; García Márquez M; Tirado-Conte G; Bernal JL; Fernández-Pérez C; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Gonzalo N; Núñez-Gil I; Del Prado N; Escaned J; Fernández-Ortiz A; Elola J; Nombela-Franco L Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Aug; 76(8):600-608. PubMed ID: 36669732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: Cost of Transcatheter vs Surgical Management. Patlolla SH; Schaff HV; Dearani JA; Stulak JM; Crestanello JA; Greason KL Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 114(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 34560043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complete transcatheter versus complete surgical treatment in patients with aortic valve stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease: Study-level meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data. Sá MP; Sun T; Fatehi Hassanabad A; Awad AK; Van den Eynde J; Malin JH; Sicouri S; Torregrossa G; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Ramlawi B J Card Surg; 2022 Jul; 37(7):2072-2083. PubMed ID: 35430755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: safe and feasible replacement alternative approaches in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. Salhab KF; Al Kindi AH; Lane JH; Knudson KE; Kapadia S; Roselli EE; Tuzcu ME; Svensson LG J Card Surg; 2013 Sep; 28(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 23869423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients at Intermediate Operative Risk With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial. Reardon MJ; Heijmen RH; Van Mieghem NM; Williams MR; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Kleiman NS; Conte J; Chawla A; Hockmuth D; Petrossian G; Robinson N; Kappetein AP; Li S; Popma JJ JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):810-814. PubMed ID: 31215985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ando T; Briasoulis A; Holmes AA; Afonso L; Schreiber T; Kondur A Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 215():14-9. PubMed ID: 27104920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes and revascularization strategies in patients with low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic valve stenosis according to the assigned treatment modality. O'Sullivan CJ; Englberger L; Hosek N; Heg D; Cao D; Stefanini GG; Stortecky S; Gloekler S; Spitzer E; Tüller D; Huber C; Pilgrim T; Praz F; Buellesfeld L; Khattab AA; Carrel T; Meier B; Windecker S; Wenaweser P JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 25946444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice. Van Mieghem NM; van der Boon RM; Faqiri E; Diletti R; Schultz C; van Geuns RJ; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP; van Domburg RT; de Jaegere PP JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):867-75. PubMed ID: 23871511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]