These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32667093)

  • 21. Evaluation of medical technologies: a generalized ROC analysis.
    Sainfort F
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 1908934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Models for Opting Out of Treatment.
    Kerr KF; Brown MD; Marsh TL; Janes H
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Feb; 39(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 30649998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves.
    Lee WC; Wu YC
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(2):e2477. PubMed ID: 26765451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of markers and risk prediction models: overview of relationships between NRI and decision-analytic measures.
    Van Calster B; Vickers AJ; Pencina MJ; Baker SG; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
    Med Decis Making; 2013 May; 33(4):490-501. PubMed ID: 23313931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty.
    Skaltsa K; Jover L; Carrasco JL
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):676-97. PubMed ID: 20976697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction using the test tradeoff: an update.
    Baker SG; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Systematic Review of the Literature Demonstrates Some Errors in the Use of Decision Curve Analysis but Generally Correct Interpretation of Findings.
    Capogrosso P; Vickers AJ
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):493-498. PubMed ID: 30819037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Basic principles of ROC analysis.
    Metz CE
    Semin Nucl Med; 1978 Oct; 8(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 112681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index.
    Hilden J; Glasziou P
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):969-86. PubMed ID: 8783436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simplified Acute Physiology Score II as Predictor of Mortality in Intensive Care Units: A Decision Curve Analysis.
    Allyn J; Ferdynus C; Bohrer M; Dalban C; Valance D; Allou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164828. PubMed ID: 27741304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preventing Heterotopic Ossification in Combat Casualties-Which Models Are Best Suited for Clinical Use?
    Alfieri KA; Potter BK; Davis TA; Wagner MB; Elster EA; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2807-13. PubMed ID: 25917420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expected utility versus expected regret theory versions of decision curve analysis do generate different results when treatment effects are taken into account.
    Hozo I; Tsalatsanis A; Djulbegovic B
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Feb; 24(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 27981695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Receiver operating curve, an aid in decision making. Principles and applications illustrated with some examples].
    Vinatier D; Monnier JC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(8):981-9. PubMed ID: 3069898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.
    Talluri R; Shete S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Weighted volume under the three-way receiver operating characteristic surface.
    Huang L; Li J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3627-3648. PubMed ID: 30453845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer using a deep convolutional neural network from multiparametric MRI.
    Song Y; Zhang YD; Yan X; Liu H; Zhou M; Hu B; Yang G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1570-1577. PubMed ID: 29659067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When is a test positive? The use of decision analysis to optimize test interpretation.
    Bergus GR
    Fam Med; 1993; 25(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 8288070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical techniques for medical decision making: applications to diagnostic radiology.
    Doubilet PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Apr; 150(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 3126627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of prediction models.
    Vickers AJ; Holland F
    Spine J; 2021 Oct; 21(10):1643-1648. PubMed ID: 33676020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.