280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32668091)
1. Mitral valve repair with minimally invasive approaches vs sternotomy: A meta-analysis of early and late results in randomized and matched observational studies.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Cavalcanti LRP; Kadyraliev B; Enginoev S; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Dreyfus G
J Card Surg; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2307-2323. PubMed ID: 32668091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-Term Outcomes of Sternal-Sparing Versus Sternotomy Approaches for Mitral Valve Repair: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.
Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Erten O; Van den Eynde J; Caldonazo T; Doenst T; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; de Souza RORR; Rodriguez R; Ramlawi B; Goldman S
Innovations (Phila); 2023; 18(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 37129060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimal Access Versus Sternotomy for Complex Mitral Valve Repair: A Meta-Analysis.
Moscarelli M; Fattouch K; Gaudino M; Nasso G; Paparella D; Punjabi P; Athanasiou T; Benedetto U; Angelini GD; Santarpino G; Speziale G
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Mar; 109(3):737-744. PubMed ID: 31479637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies.
Al Shamry A; Jegaden M; Ashafy S; Eker A; Jegaden O
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Apr; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 37024952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive beating heart technique for mitral valve surgery in patients with previous sternotomy and giant left ventricle.
Zhang H; Xu HS; Wen B; Zhao WZ; Liu C
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):122. PubMed ID: 32493495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies.
Eqbal AJ; Gupta S; Basha A; Qiu Y; Wu N; Rega F; Chu FV; Belley-Cote EP; Whitlock RP
J Card Surg; 2022 May; 37(5):1319-1327. PubMed ID: 35170791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair.
Fatehi Hassanabad A; Nagase FNI; Basha AM; Hammal F; Menon D; Kent WDT; Ali IS; Nagendran J; Stafinski T
Innovations (Phila); 2022; 17(6):471-481. PubMed ID: 36529985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al Otaibi A; Gupta S; Belley-Cote EP; Alsagheir A; Spence J; Parry D; Whitlock RP
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Jun; 58(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 27588617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?
Qiu Z; Chen X; Xu Y; Huang F; Xiao L; Yang T; Yin L
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(1):29. PubMed ID: 29653554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open vs. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: Surgical Technique, Indications and Results.
Sündermann SH; Czerny M; Falk V
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2015 Jun; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26577232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery.
Grant SW; Hickey GL; Modi P; Hunter S; Akowuah E; Zacharias J
Heart; 2019 May; 105(10):783-789. PubMed ID: 30541760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic vs other surgery techniques for mitral valve repair and/or replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Husen TF; Kohar K; Angelica R; Saputro BIL
Hellenic J Cardiol; 2023; 71():16-25. PubMed ID: 36639122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and Efficacy of the Transaxillary Access for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery-A Propensity Matched Competitive Analysis.
Taghizadeh-Waghefi A; Arzt S; De Angelis V; Schiffarth J; Petrov A; Tomko M; Alexiou K; Matschke K; Kappert U; Wilbring M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Dec; 58(12):. PubMed ID: 36557053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with equivalent cost and shorter hospital stay when compared with traditional sternotomy.
Atluri P; Stetson RL; Hung G; Gaffey AC; Szeto WY; Acker MA; Hargrove WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):385-8. PubMed ID: 26432722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional sternotomy versus right mini-thoracotomy versus robotic approach for mitral valve replacement/repair: insights from a network meta-analysis.
Yokoyama Y; Kuno T; Takagi H; Briasoulis A; Ota T
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2022 Aug; 63(4):492-497. PubMed ID: 34664809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitral valve surgery via repeat median sternotomy versus right mini-thoracotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
Shirke MM; Ravikumar N; Shawn TJX; Mutsonziwa N; Soh V; Harky A
J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4500-4509. PubMed ID: 36335611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of mitral valve repair: median sternotomy versus port-access approach.
Raanani E; Spiegelstein D; Sternik L; Preisman S; Moshkovitz Y; Smolinsky AK; Shinfeld A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19969315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay.
Woo YJ; Nacke EA
Surgery; 2006 Aug; 140(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 16904978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term results after mitral valve surgery using minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach: a propensity matched comparison of a large single-center series.
Cetinkaya A; Geier A; Bramlage K; Hein S; Bramlage P; Schönburg M; Choi YH; Richter M
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jun; 21(1):314. PubMed ID: 34174818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
