507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32668355)
1. Malignancy risk stratification and FNA recommendations for thyroid nodules: A comparison of ACR TI-RADS, AACE/ACE/AME and ATA guidelines.
Peng JY; Pan FS; Wang W; Wang Z; Shan QY; Lin JH; Luo J; Zheng YL; Hu HT; Ruan SM; Liang JY; Xie XY; Lu MD
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102625. PubMed ID: 32668355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience.
Di Fermo F; Sforza N; Rosmarin M; Morosan Allo Y; Parisi C; Santamaria J; Pacenza N; Zuk C; Faingold C; Ferraro F; Meroño T; Brenta G
Endocrine; 2020 Aug; 69(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 32291736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences between ATA, AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classifications performance in identifying cytological high-risk thyroid nodules.
Lauria Pantano A; Maddaloni E; Briganti SI; Beretta Anguissola G; Perrella E; Taffon C; Palermo A; Pozzilli P; Manfrini S; Crescenzi A
Eur J Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 178(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 29626008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.
Ruan JL; Yang HY; Liu RB; Liang M; Han P; Xu XL; Luo BM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4871-4878. PubMed ID: 30715590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The TNAPP web-based algorithm improves thyroid nodule management in clinical practice: A retrospective validation study.
Triggiani V; Lisco G; Renzulli G; Frasoldati A; Guglielmi R; Garber J; Papini E
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1080159. PubMed ID: 36778596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Malignancy: Diagnostic Performance of Seven Society Guidelines Applied to 2000 Thyroid Nodules.
Ha EJ; Na DG; Baek JH; Sung JY; Kim JH; Kang SY
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):893-900. PubMed ID: 29465333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.
Barbosa TLM; Junior COM; Graf H; Cavalvanti T; Trippia MA; da Silveira Ugino RT; de Oliveira GL; Granella VH; de Carvalho GA
BMC Endocr Disord; 2019 Oct; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 31664992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 5 Thyroid Ultrasound Stratification Systems for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules and to Avoid Biopsy Using Histology as Reference Standard.
Kuru B; Kefeli M; Danaci M
Endocr Pract; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33930581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic efficacy and inappropriate biopsy rate of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines for thyroid nodules in children and adolescents.
Li G; Zhang B; Liu J; Xiong Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1052945. PubMed ID: 37051202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, Kwak TI-RADS, and KTA/KSThR guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Zhang WB; Xu HX; Zhang YF; Guo LH; Xu SH; Zhao CK; Liu BJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 75(2):219-232. PubMed ID: 31929154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Modi L; Sun W; Shafizadeh N; Negron R; Yee-Chang M; Zhou F; Simsir A; Sheth S; Brandler TC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jul; 128(7):470-481. PubMed ID: 32078249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk-Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines.
Ha EJ; Na DG; Moon WJ; Lee YH; Choi N
Thyroid; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1532-1537. PubMed ID: 30311862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines.
Middleton WD; Teefey SA; Reading CC; Langer JE; Beland MD; Szabunio MM; Desser TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 29629797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Different Ultrasound Classification Systems of Thyroid Nodules for Identifying Malignant Potential: A Cross-sectional Study.
Chen H; Ye J; Song J; You Y; Chen W; Liu Y
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2126. PubMed ID: 33503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Multidisciplinary Head-to-Head Comparison of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System and American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems.
Huang BL; Ebner SA; Makkar JS; Bentley-Hibbert S; McConnell RJ; Lee JA; Hecht EM; Kuo JH
Oncologist; 2020 May; 25(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 31740569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discordance Between the American Thyroid Association and the American College of Radiology Guideline Systems for Thyroid Nodule Biopsy.
Kim E; Pudhucode R; Chen H; Lindeman B
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():469-474. PubMed ID: 32622161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines and American College of Radiology TI-RADS.
Liu J; Guo Y; Xiao J; Chen L; Liang Z
Endocr Pract; 2021 Jul; 27(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 34250908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of thyroid nodule FNA rates recommended by ACR TI-RADS, Kwak TI-RADS and ATA guidelines.
Qi TY; Chen X; Liu H; Mao L; Chen J; He BL; Zhang WB
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 148():110152. PubMed ID: 35033941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
