220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32671920)
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
Ravi V; Poudyal A; Pulipati P; Larsen T; Krishnan K; Trohman RG; Sharma PS; Huang HD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2559-2571. PubMed ID: 32671920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a second-generation cryoballoon catheter or contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter: A comparison of costs and long-term clinical outcomes.
Yokokawa M; Chugh A; Latchamsetty R; Ghanbari H; Crawford T; Jongnarangsin K; Cunnane R; Saeed M; Hornsby K; Krishnasamy K; Lohawijarn W; Keast R; Karpenko D; Bogun F; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 29071765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
Hoffmann E; Straube F; Wegscheider K; Kuniss M; Andresen D; Wu LQ; Tebbenjohanns J; Noelker G; Tilz RR; Chun JKR; Franke A; Stellbrink C; Garcia-Alberola A; Dorwarth U; Metzner A; Ouarrak T; Brachmann J; Kuck KH; Senges J;
Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1313-1324. PubMed ID: 31199860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Liu XH; Gao XF; Jin CL; Chen CF; Chen B; Xu YZ
Kardiol Pol; 2020 Jan; 78(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 31688837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.
Cardoso R; Mendirichaga R; Fernandes G; Healy C; Lambrakos LK; Viles-Gonzalez JF; Goldberger JJ; Mitrani RD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 27422848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Maurhofer J; Kueffer T; Madaffari A; Stettler R; Stefanova A; Seiler J; Thalmann G; Kozhuharov N; Galuszka O; Servatius H; Haeberlin A; Noti F; Tanner H; Roten L; Reichlin T
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Mar; 67(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 37776355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cryoballoon antral pulmonary vein isolation vs contact force-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein and posterior left atrial isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Yokokawa M; Chugh A; Latchamsetty R; Ghanbari H; Crawford T; Jongnarangsin K; Cunnane R; Saeed M; Sunkara B; Tezcan M; Bogun F; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1835-1841. PubMed ID: 30509365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.
Patel N; Patel K; Shenoy A; Baker WL; Makaryus AN; El-Sherif N
Curr Cardiol Rev; 2019; 15(3):230-238. PubMed ID: 30539701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.
Buiatti A; von Olshausen G; Barthel P; Schneider S; Luik A; Kaess B; Laugwitz KL; Hoppmann P
Europace; 2017 Mar; 19(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 27702864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Wasserlauf J; Pelchovitz DJ; Rhyner J; Verma N; Bohn M; Li Z; Arora R; Chicos AB; Goldberger JJ; Kim SS; Lin AC; Knight BP; Passman RS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Apr; 38(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 25627795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.
Maltoni S; Negro A; Camerlingo MD; Pecoraro V; Sassone B; Biffi M; Boriani G
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Dec; 19(12):725-738. PubMed ID: 30320723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis.
Omran H; Gutleben KJ; Molatta S; Fischbach T; Wellmann B; Horstkotte D; Körber B; Nölker G
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 107(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 29075979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.
Buist TJ; Adiyaman A; Smit JJJ; Ramdat Misier AR; Elvan A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 107(6):498-506. PubMed ID: 29411114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after an index procedure with radiofrequency versus cryo: Different pulmonary vein reconnection patterns but similar long-term outcome-Results of a multicenter analysis.
Glowniak A; Tarkowski A; Fic P; Wojewoda K; Wojcik J; Wysokinski A
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30938917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon versus Open-Irrigated Radiofrequency: A Multicenter Experience.
Aryana A; Singh SM; Kowalski M; Pujara DK; Cohen AI; Singh SK; Aleong RG; Banker RS; Fuenzalida CE; Prager NA; Bowers MR; D'Avila A; O'Neill PG
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):832-839. PubMed ID: 25917655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials.
Garg J; Chaudhary R; Palaniswamy C; Shah N; Krishnamoorthy P; Bozorgnia B; Natale A
J Atr Fibrillation; 2016; 9(3):1429. PubMed ID: 28496925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Myocardial injury biomarkers after radiofrequency catheter and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and their impact on recurrence.
Kızılırmak F; Gokdeniz T; Gunes HM; Demir GG; Cakal B; Guler GB; Guler E; Olgun FE; Kilicaslan F
Kardiol Pol; 2017; 75(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 27221959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency contact force ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score analysis.
Matta M; Anselmino M; Ferraris F; Scaglione M; Gaita F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Apr; 19(4):141-147. PubMed ID: 29432399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of extrapulmonary vein triggers and atypical atrial flutter in atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoablation: Insights from repeat ablation procedures.
Chang TY; Lo LW; Te ALD; Lin YJ; Chang SL; Hu YF; Chung FP; Chao TF; Liao JN; Tuan TC; Lin CY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Hoang MQ; Yamada S; Chen SA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 30230088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
