These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32672333)
1. Policy Process And Non-State Actors' Influence On The 2014 Mexican Soda Tax. Carriedo A; Lock K; Hawkins B Health Policy Plan; 2020 Oct; 35(8):941-952. PubMed ID: 32672333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Policy networks and competing interests in the development of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverages tax. Carriedo A; Cairney P; Barquera S; Hawkins B BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37813438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Food and beverage industry interference in science and policy: efforts to block soda tax implementation in Mexico and prevent international diffusion. Pedroza-Tobias A; Crosbie E; Mialon M; Carriedo A; Schmidt LA BMJ Glob Health; 2021 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34413076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public-Private Partnerships in Mexico: Implications of Engaging With the Food and Beverage Industry for Public Health Nutrition. Carriedo A; Ojeda E; Crosbie E; Mialon M Int J Health Policy Manag; 2024; 13():8008. PubMed ID: 38618831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico. James E; Lajous M; Reich MR Health Syst Reform; 2020; 6(1):e1669122. PubMed ID: 32043913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stakeholder analysis of the deliberation of an increase to the excise tax on sweetened beverages in Mexico. Gómez-Dantés O; Orozco-Núñez E; Torres-de la Rosa CP; López-Santiago M Salud Publica Mex; 2021 May; 63(3 May-Jun):436-443. PubMed ID: 34098624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding policy change for obesity prevention: learning from sugar-sweetened beverages taxes in Mexico and Chile. Fuster M; Burrowes S; Cuadrado C; Velasco Bernal A; Lewis S; McCarthy B; Shen GC Health Promot Int; 2021 Mar; 36(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32388550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Six lessons from introducing sweetened beverage taxes in Berkeley, Cook County, and Philadelphia: A case study comparison in agenda setting and decision making. Hagenaars LL; Jevdjevic M; Jeurissen PPT; Klazinga NS Health Policy; 2020 Sep; 124(9):932-942. PubMed ID: 32561127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis. Ahaibwe G; Abdool Karim S; Thow AM; Erzse A; Hofman K Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1892307. PubMed ID: 33874854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coca-Cola's political and policy influence in Mexico: understanding the role of institutions, interests and divided society. Gómez EJ Health Policy Plan; 2019 Sep; 34(7):520-528. PubMed ID: 31381805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Sweet talk': framing the merits of a sugar tax in Australia. Anaf J; Fisher M; Handsley E; Baum F; Friel S Health Promot Int; 2021 Oct; 36(5):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 33496322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public-private partnerships and the politics of alcohol policy in England: the Coalition Government's Public Health 'Responsibility Deal'. Hawkins B; McCambridge J BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1477. PubMed ID: 31747916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the "sugar tax" debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. Buckton CH; Fergie G; Leifeld P; Hilton S BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):490. PubMed ID: 31046718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A sweet deal for domestic industry: the political economy and framing of Vanuatu's sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Elliott LM; Waqa GD; Dalglish SL; Topp SM BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37813448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Choice should be made through… educated decisions not regressive dictates': discursive framings of a proposed 'sugar tax' in Bermuda: analysis of submissions to a government consultation. Williams S; Hill SE; Oyebode O Global Health; 2022 Oct; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 36271432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fiscal policies and regulations for healthy diets in Sri Lanka: an analysis of the political economy of taxation and traffic light labelling for sugar-sweetened beverages. Madurawala S; Kiringoda K; Thow AM; Arunatilake N Glob Health Action; 2023 Dec; 16(1):2280339. PubMed ID: 38018465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Where there's a will: can highlighting future youth-targeted marketing increase support for soda taxes? Roh S; Schuldt JP Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1610-3. PubMed ID: 24467253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy. Purtle J; Langellier B; Lê-Scherban F J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 28257409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soda Taxes: The Importance of Analysing Policy Processes Comment on "The Untapped Power of Soda Taxes: Incentivising Consumers, Generating Revenue, and Altering Corporate Behaviours". Le Bodo Y; De Wals P Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 May; 7(5):470-473. PubMed ID: 29764113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia. Mukanu MM; Abdool Karim S; Hofman K; Erzse A; Thow AM Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1872172. PubMed ID: 33876714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]