These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32672658)

  • 1. Perceived treatment need in patients with different facial profiles.
    Suphatheerawatr T; Chamnannidiadha N
    J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Jun; 9(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 32672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-perception and self-recognition of facial profiles in adolescents referred to orthodontic treatment.
    Blagec T; Milatić K; Markusi M; Šimunović L; Meštrović S
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Nov; 94(6):672-677. PubMed ID: 39194998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
    Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].
    Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic perception of patient in developmental age in interceptive orthodontic treatment.
    Parisi G; Partipilo E; Gisondi C; Condrò P; Anastasio MD; Brescia AV; Docimo R
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2024 Jun; 25(2):94-97. PubMed ID: 38699965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of profile among laypeople, dental students and orthodontic patients.
    Tufekci E; Jahangiri A; Lindauer SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):983-7. PubMed ID: 18947285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Profile types in relation to facial angle in different skeletal jaw relationships].
    Blazeyĭ Z; Tanic T; Radojicic J
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 20081785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Esthetic Preferences on Female Skeletal Class II Alterations among Laypeople of Different Facial Profiles.
    Tipyanggul W; Changsiripun C; Chamnannidiadha N
    Eur J Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39074835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.