These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32673040)

  • 1. Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes.
    Rodgers MA; Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 32673040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multilevel meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs using robust variance estimation.
    Chen M; Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35786985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA; Carter EC
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):776-795. PubMed ID: 34196473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cluster wild bootstrapping to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
    Joshi M; Pustejovsky JE; Beretvas SN
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):457-477. PubMed ID: 35218309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
    Kicinski M
    BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.
    Schneck A
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4115. PubMed ID: 29204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining how meta-analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study.
    Bramley P; López-López JA; Higgins JPT
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):816-830. PubMed ID: 34327842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews.
    Herrmann D; Sinnett P; Holmes J; Khan S; Koller C; Vassar M
    Ann Oncol; 2017 May; 28(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28039176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Anglemyer AT; Krauth D; Bero L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25880564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review.
    Filges T; Siren A; Fridberg T; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 16(4):e1124. PubMed ID: 37016617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. THE EFFECT DIRECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING SMALL-STUDY EFFECTS.
    Meng Z; Wu C; Lin L
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101830. PubMed ID: 36914304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative likelihood ratios for neutral comparisons of statistical tests in simulation studies.
    Huang Q; Trinquart L
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200102. PubMed ID: 36642800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.