These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32673067)
1. Outcomes of 1- Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Colatruglio M; Flanigan DC; Long J; DiBartola AC; Magnussen RA Am J Sports Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 32673067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or in Combination With Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction. Lee DW; Kim JG; Cho SI; Kim DH Am J Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):324-333. PubMed ID: 30640514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Preoperative Tunnel Widening On the Outcomes of a Single Stage-Only Approach to Every Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 409 Consecutive Patients From the SANTI Study Group. Pioger C; Saithna A; Rayes J; Haidar IM; Fradin T; Ngbilo C; Vieira TD; Cavaignac E; Sonnery-Cottet B Am J Sports Med; 2021 May; 49(6):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 33689510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction. Cristiani R; Engström B; Edman G; Forssblad M; Stålman A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jan; 27(1):137-145. PubMed ID: 30014185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction After Primary Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Series of 40 Patients. So SY; Suh DW; Lee SS; Jung EY; Ye DH; Ryu D; Kwon KB; Wang JH Arthroscopy; 2020 Feb; 36(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 31901397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Slope-Reducing Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Combined With a Third Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure With a Focus on Return to Impact Sports. Mabrouk A; Kley K; Jacquet C; Fayard JM; An JS; Ollivier M Am J Sports Med; 2023 Nov; 51(13):3454-3463. PubMed ID: 37885232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Versus Primary Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Study. Kösters C; Glasbrenner J; Spickermann L; Kittl C; Domnick C; Herbort M; Raschke MJ; Schliemann B Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1108-1116. PubMed ID: 32125875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Hamstring Autograft With Hybrid Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Belk JW; Kraeutler MJ; Houck DA; Smith JR; McCarty EC Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):1189-1201. PubMed ID: 31919024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation. Boutsiadis A; Panisset JC; Devitt BM; Mauris F; Barthelemy R; Barth J Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 30015501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Irradiated Hamstring Tendon Allograft Versus Autograft for Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Clinical Outcomes. Tian S; Wang B; Liu L; Wang Y; Ha C; Li Q; Yang X; Sun K Am J Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 44(10):2579-2588. PubMed ID: 27466222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Augmented With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Is Equivalent to Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction at Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review. Ambrosio L; Franco D; Vadalà G; Russo F; Papalia R Arthroscopy; 2024 Jul; 40(7):2121-2131.e1. PubMed ID: 38417640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Slope-Correction Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee Laxity. Akoto R; Alm L; Drenck TC; Frings J; Krause M; Frosch KH Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3478-3485. PubMed ID: 33135908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All-inside versus complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lv X; Wang M; Zhao T; Wang L; Dong S; Tan H J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 18(1):127. PubMed ID: 36810091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Autologous Bone Graft Versus Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate in the Treatment of Tunnel Defects in 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study With a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years. von Recum J; Gehm J; Guehring T; Vetter SY; von der Linden P; Grützner PA; Schnetzke M Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 31864574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic ACL reconstruction reduces risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis: a systematic review with minimum 10-year follow-up. Rothrauff BB; Jorge A; de Sa D; Kay J; Fu FH; Musahl V Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 31471726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Postoperative KT-1000 Arthrometer Score on Long-Term Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Goodwillie AD; Shah SS; McHugh MP; Nicholas SJ Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jun; 45(7):1522-1528. PubMed ID: 28277739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]