These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32673091)

  • 1. Common Field Data Limitations Can Substantially Bias Sexual Selection Metrics.
    Cramer ERA; Kaiser SA; Webster MS; Ryder TB
    Am Nat; 2020 Aug; 196(2):180-196. PubMed ID: 32673091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Little effect of extrapair paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection in Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis).
    Freeman-Gallant CR; Wheelwright NT; Meiklejohn KE; States SL; Sollecito SV
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 15807426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating System, Reproductive Success, and Sexual Selection in Bluntnose Klipfishes (Clinus cottoides).
    Scheepers MJ; Gouws G
    J Hered; 2019 May; 110(3):351-360. PubMed ID: 30726981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.
    Cramer ERA
    Cells; 2021 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33799610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecological and Social Factors Constrain Spatial and Temporal Opportunities for Mating in a Migratory Songbird.
    Kaiser SA; Risk BB; Sillett TS; Webster MS
    Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):283-296. PubMed ID: 28221825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extrapair mating and the strength of sexual selection: insights from a polymorphic species.
    Grunst AS; Grunst ML; Korody ML; Forrette LM; Gonser RA; Tuttle EM
    Behav Ecol; 2019; 30(2):278-290. PubMed ID: 30971857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird.
    Webster MS; Tarvin KA; Tuttle EM; Pruett-Jones S
    Evolution; 2007 Sep; 61(9):2205-11. PubMed ID: 17725624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females.
    Arnqvist G; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S26-37. PubMed ID: 15795859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish.
    Aronsen T; Berglund A; Mobley KB; Ratikainen II; Rosenqvist G
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3243-57. PubMed ID: 24152006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic monogamy despite frequent extrapair copulations in "strictly monogamous" wild jackdaws.
    Gill LF; van Schaik J; von Bayern AMP; Gahr ML
    Behav Ecol; 2020; 31(1):247-260. PubMed ID: 32372855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity.
    Jones AG; Avise JC
    J Hered; 2001; 92(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11396573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overcoming statistical bias to estimate genetic mating systems in open populations: a comparison of Bateman's principles between the sexes in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
    Mobley KB; Jones AG
    Evolution; 2013 Mar; 67(3):646-60. PubMed ID: 23461316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in blue tits (cyanistes caeruleus).
    Schlicht E; Kempenaers B
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1420-34. PubMed ID: 23617918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers.
    Sheldon BC; Ellegren H
    Anim Behav; 1999 Feb; 57(2):285-298. PubMed ID: 10049467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The strength of direct selection against female promiscuity is associated with rates of extrapair fertilizations in socially monogamous songbirds.
    Albrecht T; Kreisinger J; Piálek J
    Am Nat; 2006 May; 167(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 16671017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bateman gradients reflect variation in sexual selection in a species with dynamic sex roles.
    Hare RM; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Sep; 35(9):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 35932479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: a cautionary tale.
    Parker PG; Tang-Martinez Z
    Integr Comp Biol; 2005 Nov; 45(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 21676840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection.
    Byers J; Dunn S
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):802-4. PubMed ID: 23139332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The combined effects of pre- and post-copulatory processes are masking sexual conflict over mating rate in Gerris buenoi.
    Devost E; Turgeon J
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 26468888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.