1082 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32673217)
1. Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.
Alvarez-Lopez F; Maina MF; Saigí-Rubió F
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e17491. PubMed ID: 32673217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Simulator for Psychomotor Skill Training in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Task Metrics and Score Validity.
Alvarez-Lopez F; Maina MF; Arango F; Saigí-Rubió F
JMIR Serious Games; 2020 Oct; 8(4):e19723. PubMed ID: 33107833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
Van Sickle KR; Ritter EM; McClusky DA; Lederman A; Baghai M; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects.
Weinstock P; Rehder R; Prabhu SP; Forbes PW; Roussin CJ; Cohen AR
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28438070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.
Gallagher AG; Lederman AB; McGlade K; Satava RM; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 15026925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
Chaudhry A; Sutton C; Wood J; Stone R; McCloy R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.
van der Meijden OA; Schijven MP
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1180-90. PubMed ID: 19118414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy.
Maschuw K; Schlosser K; Kupietz E; Slater EP; Weyers P; Hassan I
World J Surg; 2011 Mar; 35(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 21190109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychomotor skills development for Veress needle placement using a virtual reality and haptics-based simulator.
Di Vece C; Luciano C; De Momi E
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Apr; 16(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33709241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual Reality Simulator for Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Korzeniowski P; Chacon CS; Russell VR; Clarke SA; Bello F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Nov; 31(11):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 34314635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of real-time virtual reality-based teaching cues on learning needle passing for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Malpani A; Vedula SS; Lin HC; Hager GD; Taylor RH
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Jul; 15(7):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32385598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mapping the maze of minimally invasive surgery simulators.
van Empel PJ; van der Veer WM; van Rijssen LB; Cuesta MA; Scheele F; Bonjer HJ; Meijerink WJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012; 22(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 22145607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation-Based Training Platforms for Arthroscopy: A Randomized Comparison of Virtual Reality Learning to Benchtop Learning.
Middleton RM; Alvand A; Garfjeld Roberts P; Hargrove C; Kirby G; Rees JL
Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 28073670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bimanual Fundamentals: Validation of a New Curriculum for Virtual Reality Training of Laparoscopic Skills.
van Ginkel MPH; Schijven MP; van Grevenstein WMU; Schreuder HWR
Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):523-533. PubMed ID: 32865136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.
Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting.
Lehmann KS; Ritz JP; Maass H; Cakmak HK; Kuehnapfel UG; Germer CT; Bretthauer G; Buhr HJ
Ann Surg; 2005 Mar; 241(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 15729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Commercial Off-The-Shelf Devices for the Detection of Manual Gestures in Surgery: Systematic Literature Review.
Alvarez-Lopez F; Maina MF; Saigí-Rubió F
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(5):e11925. PubMed ID: 31066679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
