2172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32673752)
1. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alginate dependent changes of physical properties in 3D bioprinted cell-laden porous scaffolds affect cell viability and cell morphology.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Vetsch JR; Paul GR; Rubert M; Müller R
Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 14(6):065009. PubMed ID: 31426033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological cell bioprinting density in human bone-derived cell-laden scaffolds enhances matrix mineralization rate and stiffness under dynamic loading.
de Leeuw AM; Graf R; Lim PJ; Zhang J; Schädli GN; Peterhans S; Rohrbach M; Giunta C; Rüger M; Rubert M; Müller R
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1310289. PubMed ID: 38419730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioprinting EphrinB2-Modified Dental Pulp Stem Cells with Enhanced Osteogenic Capacity for Alveolar Bone Engineering.
Wang W; Zhu Y; Li J; Geng T; Jia J; Wang X; Yuan C; Wang P
Tissue Eng Part A; 2023 Apr; 29(7-8):244-255. PubMed ID: 36606680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of 3-dimensional Bioprinting Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffold Extract on Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.
Yu H; Zhang X; Song W; Pan T; Wang H; Ning T; Wei Q; Xu HHK; Wu B; Ma D
J Endod; 2019 Jun; 45(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 31056297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue.
Chimene D; Miller L; Cross LM; Jaiswal MK; Singh I; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15976-15988. PubMed ID: 32091189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanically tunable photo-cross-linkable bioinks for osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in 3D bioprinted constructs.
Kamaraj M; Sreevani G; Prabusankar G; Rath SN
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Dec; 131():112478. PubMed ID: 34857263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tomographic volumetric bioprinting of heterocellular bone-like tissues in seconds.
Gehlen J; Qiu W; Schädli GN; Müller R; Qin XH
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():49-60. PubMed ID: 35718102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of culture conditions on the bone regeneration potential of osteoblast-laden 3D bioprinted constructs.
Raveendran N; Ivanovski S; Vaquette C
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():190-201. PubMed ID: 36155098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation.
Maturavongsadit P; Narayanan LK; Chansoria P; Shirwaiker R; Benhabbour SR
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2021 Mar; 4(3):2342-2353. PubMed ID: 35014355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D bioprinting of in situ vascularized tissue engineered bone for repairing large segmental bone defects.
Shen M; Wang L; Gao Y; Feng L; Xu C; Li S; Wang X; Wu Y; Guo Y; Pei G
Mater Today Bio; 2022 Dec; 16():100382. PubMed ID: 36033373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An osteogenic bioink composed of alginate, cellulose nanofibrils, and polydopamine nanoparticles for 3D bioprinting and bone tissue engineering.
Im S; Choe G; Seok JM; Yeo SJ; Lee JH; Kim WD; Lee JY; Park SA
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Apr; 205():520-529. PubMed ID: 35217077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endothelial cells support osteogenesis in an in vitro vascularized bone model developed by 3D bioprinting.
Chiesa I; De Maria C; Lapomarda A; Fortunato GM; Montemurro F; Di Gesù R; Tuan RS; Vozzi G; Gottardi R
Biofabrication; 2020 Feb; 12(2):025013. PubMed ID: 31929117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioprinting of mineralized constructs utilizing multichannel plotting of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement and a cell-laden bioink.
Ahlfeld T; Doberenz F; Kilian D; Vater C; Korn P; Lauer G; Lode A; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2018 Jul; 10(4):045002. PubMed ID: 30004388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D Bioprinting of a Bioactive Composite Scaffold for Cell Delivery in Periodontal Tissue Regeneration.
Miao G; Liang L; Li W; Ma C; Pan Y; Zhao H; Zhang Q; Xiao Y; Yang X
Biomolecules; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37509098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrically stimulated 3D bioprinting of gelatin-polypyrrole hydrogel with dynamic semi-IPN network induces osteogenesis via collective signaling and immunopolarization.
Dutta SD; Ganguly K; Randhawa A; Patil TV; Patel DK; Lim KT
Biomaterials; 2023 Mar; 294():121999. PubMed ID: 36669301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
