217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32674514)
1. Mapping of Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Systems Using a Frequency-Domain Ground Penetrating Radar and Evaluating Its Performance Using a Single-Frequency Multi-Receiver Electromagnetic Induction Instrument.
Koganti T; Van De Vijver E; Allred BJ; Greve MH; Ringgaard J; Iversen BV
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 32674514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping of Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Systems Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery and Ground Penetrating Radar.
Koganti T; Ghane E; Martinez LR; Iversen BV; Allred BJ
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33921184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multifrequency electromagnetic geophysical tools for evaluating the hydrologic conditions and performance of evapotranspiration barriers.
Mangel AR; Linneman D; Sprinkle P; Jaysaval P; Thomle J; Strickland C
J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114123. PubMed ID: 34839175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies.
Wijewardana YN; Shilpadi AT; Mowjood MI; Kawamoto K; Galagedara LW
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Feb; 189(2):57. PubMed ID: 28091883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urban soil exploration through multi-receiver electromagnetic induction and stepped-frequency ground penetrating radar.
Van De Vijver E; Van Meirvenne M; Vandenhaute L; Delefortrie S; De Smedt P; Saey T; Seuntjens P
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jul; 17(7):1271-81. PubMed ID: 26040331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary use of ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to study tree roots in pine forests and poplar plantations.
Zenone T; Morelli G; Teobaldelli M; Fischanger F; Matteucci M; Sordini M; Armani A; Ferrè C; Chiti T; Seufert G
Funct Plant Biol; 2008 Dec; 35(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 32688853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States.
Butnor JR; Doolittle JA; Kress L; Cohen S; Johnsen KH
Tree Physiol; 2001 Nov; 21(17):1269-78. PubMed ID: 11696414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Data Processing and Antenna Frequency on Spatial Structure Modelling of GPR Data.
De Benedetto D; Quarto R; Castrignanò A; Palumbo DA
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16430-47. PubMed ID: 26184190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Method for Compensating Signal Attenuation Using Stepped-Frequency Ground Penetrating Radar.
Liu T; Zhu Y; Su Y
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29702614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of soil physical properties of reclaimed land in open-pit mining area: feasibility of application of ground penetrating radar.
Luo G; Cao Y; Xu H; Yang G; Wang S; Huang Y; Bai Z
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(7):392. PubMed ID: 34101032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Multi-Frequency and Multi-Coil Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) for Mapping Properties in Shallow Podsolic Soils.
Altdorff D; Sadatcharam K; Unc A; Krishnapillai M; Galagedara L
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32325857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Background clutter amplitude and frequency of GPR signals to analyse water content in sedimentary deposits: Urban infrastructure environment.
Rasol M; Pérez-Gracia V; Assunção SS; González-Drigo R; Clapes J; Sossa VA; Schmidt F
Environ Res; 2022 Sep; 212(Pt A):113189. PubMed ID: 35390298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic Transducers as Passive Cooperative Targets for Wireless Sensing of the Sub-Surface World: Challenges of Probing with Ground Penetrating RADAR.
Friedt JM; Martin G; Goavec-Mérou G; Rabus D; Alzuaga S; Arapan L; Sagnard M; Carry É
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29337914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coupling time-lapse ground penetrating radar surveys and infiltration experiments to characterize two types of non-uniform flow.
Di Prima S; Giannini V; Ribeiro Roder L; Giadrossich F; Lassabatere L; Stewart RD; Abou Najm MR; Longo V; Campus S; Winiarski T; Angulo-Jaramillo R; Del Campo A; Capello G; Biddoccu M; Roggero PP; Pirastru M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 1):150410. PubMed ID: 34571219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disturbances in the soil: finding buried bodies and other evidence using ground penetrating radar.
Miller PS
J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 8754575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach to 3D modelling ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data - A case study of a cemetery and applications for criminal investigation.
Kelly TB; Angel MN; O'Connor DE; Huff CC; Morris LE; Wach GD
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110882. PubMed ID: 34182205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar.
Saito H; Kuroda S; Iwasaki T; Fujimaki H; Nagai N; Sala J
J Vis Exp; 2018 May; (135):. PubMed ID: 29782019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating LNAPL contamination using GPR signal attenuation analysis and dielectric property measurements: practical implications for hydrological studies.
Cassidy NJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Oct; 94(1-2):49-75. PubMed ID: 17601633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods: 0-3 years after burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Hansen JD; Jones GM; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1467-86. PubMed ID: 22509973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia, South America.
Molina CM; Pringle JK; Saumett M; Evans GT
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():106-15. PubMed ID: 26921813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
