BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32674596)

  • 1. Ankle Fractures: The Current State of Online Patient Information.
    Noback PC; Trupia EP; Dziesinski LK; Sarpong NO; Trofa DP; Vosseller JT
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2021 Aug; 14(4):324-333. PubMed ID: 32674596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.
    Noback PC; Trofa DP; Dziesinski LK; Trupia EP; Galle S; Rosenwasser MP
    Hand (N Y); 2020 Jul; 15(4):563-572. PubMed ID: 30556422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
    Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and readability of online resources on chronic ankle instability.
    Schwarz GM; Lisy M; Hajdu S; Windhager R; Willegger M
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2022 Apr; 28(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 34083141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Online Sources on the Diagnosis and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle.
    Alshaikh L; Shimozono Y; Dankert JF; Ubillus H; Kennedy JG
    Cartilage; 2021 Dec; 13(1_suppl):1422S-1428S. PubMed ID: 34109846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
    PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and Readability of Online Information on In-Office Vocal Fold Injections.
    Yi GS; Hu A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 31701778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
    Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality and readability of internet information regarding clavicle fractures.
    Zhang D; Schumacher C; Harris MB
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 26775060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.