130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32674596)
1. Ankle Fractures: The Current State of Online Patient Information.
Noback PC; Trupia EP; Dziesinski LK; Sarpong NO; Trofa DP; Vosseller JT
Foot Ankle Spec; 2021 Aug; 14(4):324-333. PubMed ID: 32674596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.
Noback PC; Trofa DP; Dziesinski LK; Trupia EP; Galle S; Rosenwasser MP
Hand (N Y); 2020 Jul; 15(4):563-572. PubMed ID: 30556422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality and readability of online resources on chronic ankle instability.
Schwarz GM; Lisy M; Hajdu S; Windhager R; Willegger M
Foot Ankle Surg; 2022 Apr; 28(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 34083141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Online Sources on the Diagnosis and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle.
Alshaikh L; Shimozono Y; Dankert JF; Ubillus H; Kennedy JG
Cartilage; 2021 Dec; 13(1_suppl):1422S-1428S. PubMed ID: 34109846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and Readability of Online Information on In-Office Vocal Fold Injections.
Yi GS; Hu A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 31701778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality and readability of internet information regarding clavicle fractures.
Zhang D; Schumacher C; Harris MB
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 26775060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]