213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32677052)
1. Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data.
Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Howell RM; Followill DS; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259. PubMed ID: 32677052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dataset of users' photon beam modeling parameters for the Eclipse, Pinnacle, and RayStation treatment planning systems.
Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Followill DS; Howell RM; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):282-288. PubMed ID: 31667870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.
May L; Hardcastle N; Hernandez V; Saez J; Rosenfeld A; Poder J
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):910-921. PubMed ID: 38141043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.
Chen S; Yi BY; Yang X; Xu H; Prado KL; D'Souza WD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):322–332. PubMed ID: 26699315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A radiotherapy community data-driven approach to determine which complexity metrics best predict the impact of atypical TPS beam modeling on clinical dose calculation accuracy.
Brooks FMD; Glenn MC; Hernandez V; Saez J; Mehrens H; Pollard-Larkin JM; Howell RM; Peterson CB; Nelson CL; Clark CH; Kry SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14318. PubMed ID: 38427776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system.
De Roover R; Crijns W; Poels K; Michiels S; Nulens A; Vanstraelen B; Petillion S; De Brabandere M; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):328-339. PubMed ID: 30417523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photon beam modeling variations predict errors in IMRT dosimetry audits.
Glenn MC; Brooks F; Peterson CB; Howell RM; Followill DS; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Jan; 166():8-14. PubMed ID: 34748857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.
Glenn MC; Hernandez V; Saez J; Followill DS; Howell RM; Pollard-Larkin JM; Zhou S; Kry SF
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205015. PubMed ID: 30230475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-unit variability of multi-leaf collimator parameters for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: a multi-institutional survey.
Isono M; Akino Y; Mizuno H; Tanaka Y; Masai N; Yamamoto T
J Radiat Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 31927580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unlocking a closed system: dosimetric commissioning of a ring gantry linear accelerator in a multivendor environment.
Saini A; Tichacek C; Johansson W; Redler G; Zhang G; Moros EG; Qayyum M; Feygelman V
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 22(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 33452738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rounded leaf end modeling in Pinnacle VMAT treatment planning for fixed jaw linacs.
Young LA; Yang F; Cao N; Meyer J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):149-162. PubMed ID: 27929490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification of dosimetric accuracy on the TrueBeam STx: rounded leaf effect of the high definition MLC.
Kielar KN; Mok E; Hsu A; Wang L; Luxton G
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6360-71. PubMed ID: 23039672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons.
Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric leaf gap and leaf trailing effect in a double-stacked multileaf collimator.
Hernandez V; Saez J; Angerud A; Cayez R; Khamphan C; Nguyen D; Vieillevigne L; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3413-3424. PubMed ID: 33932237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicted Inferior Outcomes for Lung SBRT With Treatment Planning Systems That Fail Independent Phantom-Based Audits.
Greer MD; Koger B; Glenn M; Kang J; Rengan R; Zeng J; Ford E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 36535431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the sensitivity of TG-119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors.
McVicker D; Yin FF; Adamson JD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26894330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
