358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32677085)
21. Development, validation, and simplification of a scanner-specific CT simulator.
Tunissen SAM; Oostveen LJ; Moriakov N; Teuwen J; Michielsen K; Smit EJ; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2081-2095. PubMed ID: 37656009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.
Eck BL; Fahmi R; Brown KM; Zabic S; Raihani N; Miao J; Wilson DL
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6098-111. PubMed ID: 26429285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
Li K; Garrett J; Ge Y; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071911. PubMed ID: 24989389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky NE; Morcos M; Wu P; Viswanathan AN; Siewerdsen JH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):187-200. PubMed ID: 31578811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images.
Smith TB; Abadi E; Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7698-7711. PubMed ID: 34713908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Takata T; Seto I
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6359-6367. PubMed ID: 36047991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical Note: Scanner dependence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with 3D noise power spectrum central frequency and noise magnitude ratios.
Hasegawa A; Ishihara T; Allan Thomas M; Pan T
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4993-5003. PubMed ID: 34287936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance evaluation of a micro-CT system for laboratory animal imaging with iterative reconstruction capabilities.
Muller FM; Vanhove C; Vandeghinste B; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3121-3133. PubMed ID: 35170057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Brain image quality according to beam collimation width and image reconstruction algorithm: A phantom study.
Greffier J; Viry A; Durand Q; Hajdu SD; Frandon J; Beregi JP; Dabli D; Racine D
Phys Med; 2023 Apr; 108():102558. PubMed ID: 36905775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving Low-contrast Detectability and Noise Texture Pattern for Computed Tomography Using Iterative Reconstruction Accelerated with Machine Learning Method: A Phantom Study.
Funama Y; Takahashi H; Goto T; Aoki Y; Yoshida R; Kumagai Y; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):929-936. PubMed ID: 31918961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm: Image quality evaluation for brain protocol at decreasing dose indexes in comparison with FBP and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Tomasi S; Szilagyi KE; Barca P; Bisello F; Spagnoli L; Domenichelli S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2024 Mar; 119():103319. PubMed ID: 38422902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner.
Oostveen LJ; Boedeker KL; Brink M; Prokop M; de Lange F; Sechopoulos I
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2552-2560. PubMed ID: 32040726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Omotayo A; Elbakri I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods.
Chen B; Christianson O; Wilson JM; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071909. PubMed ID: 24989387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technical Note: Quality assessment of virtual monochromatic spectral images on a dual energy CT scanner.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():114-121. PubMed ID: 33610006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography.
Nagayama Y; Emoto T; Kato Y; Kidoh M; Oda S; Sakabe D; Funama Y; Nakaura T; Hayashi H; Takada S; Uchimura R; Hatemura M; Tsujita K; Hirai T
Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):8488-8500. PubMed ID: 37432405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
