391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32677379)
1. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Kang JH; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Eun NL; Ko KH; Son EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 30174479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery.
Bae MS; Bernard-Davila B; Sung JS; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():171-177. PubMed ID: 31307644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing patterns of breast cancer on preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and resection margin in breast conserving therapy.
Kim OH; Kim SJ; Lee JS
Breast Dis; 2016 Feb; 36(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27177341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Barth RJ; Krishnaswamy V; Paulsen KD; Rooney TB; Wells WA; Angeles CV; Zuurbier RA; Rosenkranz K; Poplack S; Tosteson TD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3099-3108. PubMed ID: 31359283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of invasive disease in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma without stromal invasion, with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US).
Maeda H; Hayashida T; Watanuki R; Kikuchi M; Nakashoji A; Yokoe T; Seki T; Takahashi M; Kitagawa Y
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33200381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Results After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer: A 10-year Follow-up.
Clough KB; van la Parra RFD; Thygesen HH; Levy E; Russ E; Halabi NM; Sarfati I; Nos C
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 28448389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
