These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32678065)

  • 1. Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.
    Buljan I; Garcia-Costa D; Grimaldo F; Squazzoni F; Marušić A
    Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32678065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review.
    Haffar S; Bazerbachi F; Murad MH
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Apr; 94(4):670-676. PubMed ID: 30797567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The finer points of writing and refereeing scientific articles.
    Bain BJ; Littlewood TJ; Szydlo RM
    Br J Haematol; 2016 Feb; 172(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 26754408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor.
    García JA; Rodriguez-Sánchez R; Fdez-Valdivia J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):265-283. PubMed ID: 29079911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis.
    Tropini C; Finlay BB; Nichter M; Melby MK; Metcalf JL; Dominguez-Bello MG; Zhao L; McFall-Ngai MJ; Geva-Zatorsky N; Amato KR; Undurraga EA; Poinar HN; Gilbert JA
    mBio; 2023 Dec; 14(6):e0109123. PubMed ID: 37975666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. So…….You Want to be a Peer Reviewer?
    Genter MB
    Int J Toxicol; 2024; 43(4):421-424. PubMed ID: 38767005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
    Katz A
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of the manuscript reviewer.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.
    Bowman JD
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(10):176. PubMed ID: 25657363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time": Reviewer Etiquette Matters.
    Durning SJ; Sklar DP; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2019 Jun; 94(6):744-745. PubMed ID: 31136334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewer Assistance: Optimizing Comments for Major Revision and Reject Decisions.
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):447. PubMed ID: 26901000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new reviewer assistance program: a multipronged approach!
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):1. PubMed ID: 23789652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Palepu A; Hébert PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25510373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer Reviewer Contributions, Challenges, and Training.
    Pickler RH
    Nurs Res; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 73(5):337-338. PubMed ID: 39179242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts.
    Dhillon P
    FEBS J; 2021 May; 288(9):2750-2756. PubMed ID: 33486891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.