These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32678767)

  • 21. Postural and trunk muscle response to sudden release during stoop lifting tasks before and after fatigue of the trunk erector muscles.
    Chow DH; Man JW; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):607-24. PubMed ID: 15204290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Directionality of anticipatory activation of trunk muscles in a lifting task depends on load knowledge.
    van Dieën JH; de Looze MP
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 128(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 10501812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Muscular and centre of pressure response to sudden release of load in symmetric and asymmetric stoop lifting tasks.
    Chow DH; Cheng IY; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15627417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between the effectiveness of expiration and abdominal bracing maneuvers in maintaining spinal stability following sudden trunk loading.
    Ishida H; Suehiro T; Kurozumi C; Watanabe S
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():125-9. PubMed ID: 26711271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pivoting with the load. An alternative for protecting the back in asymmetrical lifting.
    Gagnon M; Plamondon A; Gravel D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1515-24. PubMed ID: 8235824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computation of trunk stability in forward perturbations: effects of preload, perturbation load, initial flexion and abdominal preactivation.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(4):716-720. PubMed ID: 25636856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of insoles with a peroneal pressure point on the electromyographic activity of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus during gait.
    Ludwig O; Kelm J; Fröhlich M
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9(1):33. PubMed ID: 27555883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Bug P
    J Biomech; 2003 Dec; 36(12):1829-36. PubMed ID: 14614936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Difference of the thickness and activation of trunk muscles during static stoop lift at different loads between subjects with and without low back pain.
    Yang HS
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2018; 31(3):481-488. PubMed ID: 29332031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Traditional posterior load carriage: effects of load mass and size on torso kinematics, kinetics, muscle activity and movement stability.
    Muslim K; Nussbaum MA
    Ergonomics; 2016; 59(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 25994335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new muscle co-activation index for biomechanical load evaluation in work activities.
    Ranavolo A; Mari S; Conte C; Serrao M; Silvetti A; Iavicoli S; Draicchio F
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(6):966-79. PubMed ID: 25555042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.
    Baltrusch SJ; van Dieën JH; Bruijn SM; Koopman AS; van Bennekom CAM; Houdijk H
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):903-916. PubMed ID: 30929608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lateral wedges with and without custom arch support for people with medial knee osteoarthritis and pronated feet: an exploratory randomized crossover study.
    Hunt MA; Takacs J; Krowchuk NM; Hatfield GL; Hinman RS; Chang R
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():20. PubMed ID: 28473871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes of lumbar posture and tissue loading during static trunk bending.
    Alessa F; Ning X
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():59-68. PubMed ID: 29161614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trunk muscle use during pulling tasks: effects of a lifting belt and footing conditions.
    Lavender SA; Chen SH; Li YC; Andersson GB
    Hum Factors; 1998 Mar; 40(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 9579110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trunk stability in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.
    Chini G; Varrecchia T; Conforto S; De Nunzio AM; Draicchio F; Falla D; Ranavolo A
    Gait Posture; 2023 May; 102():72-79. PubMed ID: 36934473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 14706328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Creep and fatigue development in the low back in static flexion.
    Shin G; D'Souza C; Liu YH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):1873-8. PubMed ID: 19644340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.