These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32678787)

  • 1. Measuring driver distraction - Evaluation of the box task method as a tool for assessing in-vehicle system demand.
    Morgenstern T; Wögerbauer EM; Naujoks F; Krems JF; Keinath A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103181. PubMed ID: 32678787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The box task - a method for assessing in-vehicle system demand.
    Trommler D; Morgenstern T; Wögerbauer EM; Naujoks F; Krems JF; Keinath A
    MethodsX; 2021; 8():101261. PubMed ID: 34434783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving.
    Beckers N; Schreiner S; Bertrand P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():25-34. PubMed ID: 27633195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The long road home from distraction: Investigating the time-course of distraction recovery in driving.
    Bowden VK; Loft S; Wilson MK; Howard J; Visser TAW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():23-32. PubMed ID: 30610996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of police mobile computer terminal interface design on officer driving distraction.
    Zahabi M; Kaber D
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():26-38. PubMed ID: 29122198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
    Biondi FN; Balasingam B; Ayare P
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):804-812. PubMed ID: 32552116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A spectral power analysis of driving behavior changes during the transition from nondistraction to distraction.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 28534644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does a lower predictability of lane changes affect performance in the Lane Change Task?
    Petzoldt T; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):1218-24. PubMed ID: 24636727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of speech-based assistants on the driver's cognitive distraction.
    Loew A; Koniakowsky I; Forster Y; Naujoks F; Keinath A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106898. PubMed ID: 36401974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving distracted with friends: Effect of passengers and driver distraction on young drivers' behavior.
    Zhang F; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105246. PubMed ID: 31421453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments.
    Innes RJ; Evans NJ; Howard ZL; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):896-909. PubMed ID: 32749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway.
    Li Z; Wang C; Fu R; Sun Q; Zhang H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231151. PubMed ID: 32240274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.