These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021? Gordon AM; Conway CA; Sheth BK; Magruder ML; Vakharia RM; Levine WN; Razi AE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 34913886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Residency Match: Interview Experiences, Postinterview Communication, and Associated Distress. Berriochoa C; Reddy CA; Dorsey S; Campbell S; Poblete-Lopez C; Schlenk R; Spencer A; Lee J; Eagleton M; Tendulkar RD J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30154970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Applying to residency: survey of neurosurgical residency applicants on virtual recruitment during COVID-19. Snyder MH; Reddy VP; Iyer AM; Ganju A; Selden NR; Johnson JN; Wolfe SQ; J Neurosurg; 2022 Jul; 137(1):273-282. PubMed ID: 34826806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Discriminatory questions asked during residency programme interviews: perspective from both interviewers and applicants. Harkin E; Murphy M; Liskutin T; Nystrom L; Wu K; Schiff A Postgrad Med J; 2021 Jun; 97(1148):355-362. PubMed ID: 32660961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perceptions of the Virtual Neurosurgery Application Cycle During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Program Director Survey. Jimenez AE; Khalafallah AM; Romano RM; Chambless LB; Wolfe SQ; Witham TF; Huang J; Mukherjee D World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e590-e604. PubMed ID: 34363998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing Residency Applicants' Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt. Schnapp BH; Ritter D; Kraut AS; Fallon S; Westergaard MC West J Emerg Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 30643616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Yousuf SJ; Kwagyan J; Jones LS Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 23084123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integrated vascular surgery applicants' perspectives of virtual residency interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 application cycle. Coluccio M; Shridhar N; Liang T; Harris L J Vasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 77(2):634-639.e2. PubMed ID: 36150637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Otolaryngology Applicant Perspectives on In-person and Virtual Residency Interviews. Barrera S; Agarwal A; Cabrera-Muffly C; Groves M; Cottrill E; Allen A; Koehn H; Megow L; Cognetti D; Stringer S; Kane AC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Apr; 170(4):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 38279960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the Impact of Changes to USMLE Step 1 Grading on Evaluation of Neurosurgery Residency Applicants in the United States: A Program Director Survey. Stein JS; Estevez-Ordonez D; Laskay NMB; Atchley TJ; Saccomano BW; Hale AT; Patel OU; Burge K; Haynes W; Yadav I; Van Wagoner N; Markert JM World Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 166():e511-e520. PubMed ID: 35843584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists. Hern HG; Johnson B; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC West J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 25834683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In-person Versus Virtual Interviews in the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Application Process: An Applicant Perspective. Schwartzman K; Kennedy K J Surg Educ; 2023 Oct; 80(10):1479-1483. PubMed ID: 37612197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process. Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match. Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews. Hern HG; Wills CP; Alter HJ; Bowman SH; Burns BD; Loyd J; Schneider JI; Yarris LM J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 8(5):759-762. PubMed ID: 28018543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gender Based Differences in Discriminatory Questions Asked of Urology Applicants during Residency Interviews. Keeter MK; Singal A; Demzik A; Roston A; Shah N; Kielb SJ Urol Pract; 2019 Jan; 6(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 37312369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties. Mudalegundi S; Clifton M; Lifchez S; LaPorte D; Ramanathan S; Sabit AH; Woreta F J Surg Educ; 2024 Aug; 81(8):1013-1023. PubMed ID: 38755046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors: Perspectives following USMLE Step 1 Conversion to Pass/Fail and Virtual Only Interviews. Fan RR; Aziz F; Wittgen CM; Williams MS; Smeds MR Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():32-41. PubMed ID: 36179944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the Virtual Interview Format for Resident Recruitment as a Result of COVID-19 Restrictions: Residency Program Directors' Perspectives. Ponterio JM; Levy L; Lakhi NA Acad Med; 2022 Sep; 97(9):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 35507455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]