These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32679578)

  • 1. Linear versus deep learning methods for noisy speech separation for EEG-informed attention decoding.
    Das N; Zegers J; Van Hamme H; Francart T; Bertrand A
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(4):046039. PubMed ID: 32679578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG-Informed Attended Speaker Extraction From Recorded Speech Mixtures With Application in Neuro-Steered Hearing Prostheses.
    Van Eyndhoven S; Francart T; Bertrand A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 May; 64(5):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 27392339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-Based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions.
    Aroudi A; Mirkovic B; De Vos M; Doclo S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Apr; 27(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 30843845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust decoding of the speech envelope from EEG recordings through deep neural networks.
    Thornton M; Mandic D; Reichenbach T
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35709698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions.
    Das N; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):066017. PubMed ID: 30207293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG-based auditory attention decoding using speech-level-based segmented computational models.
    Wang L; Wu EX; Chen F
    J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33957606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speaker separation in realistic noise environments with applications to a cognitively-controlled hearing aid.
    Borgström BJ; Brandstein MS; Ciccarelli GA; Quatieri TF; Smalt CJ
    Neural Netw; 2021 Aug; 140():136-147. PubMed ID: 33765529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain-informed speech separation (BISS) for enhancement of target speaker in multitalker speech perception.
    Ceolini E; Hjortkjær J; Wong DDE; O'Sullivan J; Raghavan VS; Herrero J; Mehta AD; Liu SC; Mesgarani N
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117282. PubMed ID: 32828921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive attention-driven speech enhancement for EEG-informed hearing prostheses.
    Das N; Van Eyndhoven S; Francart T; Bertrand A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():77-80. PubMed ID: 28268285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Interpretable Performance Metric for Auditory Attention Decoding Algorithms in a Context of Neuro-Steered Gain Control.
    Geirnaert S; Francart T; Bertrand A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jan; 28(1):307-317. PubMed ID: 31715568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural tracking to go: auditory attention decoding and saliency detection with mobile EEG.
    Straetmans L; Holtze B; Debener S; Jaeger M; Mirkovic B
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jan; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 34902846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ear-EEG-based binaural speech enhancement (ee-BSE) using auditory attention detection and audiometric characteristics of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Zakeri S
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Aug; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34289464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What are we
    Rotaru I; Geirnaert S; Heintz N; Van de Ryck I; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Feb; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 38266281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep learning-based auditory attention decoding in listeners with hearing impairment
    Tanveer MA; Skoglund MA; Bernhardsson B; Alickovic E
    J Neural Eng; 2024 May; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 38729132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Two-Talker Attention Decoding from EEG with Nonlinear Neural Networks and Linear Methods.
    Ciccarelli G; Nolan M; Perricone J; Calamia PT; Haro S; O'Sullivan J; Mesgarani N; Quatieri TF; Smalt CJ
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11538. PubMed ID: 31395905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.
    O'Sullivan J; Chen Z; Herrero J; McKhann GM; Sheth SA; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Oct; 14(5):056001. PubMed ID: 28776506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection.
    Das N; Biesmans W; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056014. PubMed ID: 27618842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG-based detection of the locus of auditory attention with convolutional neural networks.
    Vandecappelle S; Deckers L; Das N; Ansari AH; Bertrand A; Francart T
    Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33929315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.