BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32680737)

  • 1. Patent foramen ovale closure in children without cardiopathy: Child-PFO study.
    Miton N; Godart F; Milani G; Jalal Z; Karsenty C; Baruteau AE; Gronier C; Aldebert P; Douchin S; Lucron H; Chalard A; Houeijeh A; Petit J; Hascoet S; Thambo JB; Dauphin C
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020; 113(8-9):513-524. PubMed ID: 32680737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three echo-guidance techniques in percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for stroke prevention: Conventional transoesophageal, microprobe transoesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography.
    Reibel I; Hauguel-Moreau M; Guedeney P; Hage G; Hammoudi N; Duthoit G; Zeitouni M; Lattuca B; Kernéis M; Collet JP; Silvain J; Montalescot G;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2023 Nov; 116(11):523-528. PubMed ID: 37838576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of recurrent events in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale within the CLOSURE I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a Patent Foramen Ovale) trial.
    Elmariah S; Furlan AJ; Reisman M; Burke D; Vardi M; Wimmer NJ; Ling S; Chen X; Kent DM; Massaro J; Mauri L;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):913-20. PubMed ID: 25147037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of residual shunt rate and complications across 6 different closure devices for patent foramen ovale.
    Gevorgyan Fleming R; Kumar P; West B; Noureddin N; Rusheen J; Aboulhosn J; Tobis JM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):365-372. PubMed ID: 31654558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: outcomes with the Premere and Amplatzer devices.
    Bissessor N; Wong AW; Hourigan LA; Jayasinghe RS; Scalia GS; Burstow DJ; Griffiths LR; Savage M; Walters DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2011; 12(3):164-169. PubMed ID: 21640934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of different devices for transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale assessed by serial transoesophageal echocardiography and rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events in a long-term follow-up.
    Luani B; Markovic S; Krumsdorf U; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
    EuroIntervention; 2015 May; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 25572024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term follow-up after PFO device closure: Outcomes and Complications in a Single-center Experience.
    Taggart NW; Reeder GS; Lennon RJ; Slusser JP; Freund MA; Cabalka AK; Cetta F; Hagler DJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 89(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 27027873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure using the Occlutech Figulla device: More than 1,300 patient-years of follow up.
    Snijder RJR; Renes LE; Suttorp MJ; Ten Berg JM; Post MC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1080-1084. PubMed ID: 30461175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure for paradoxical emboli without echocardiographic guidance.
    Varma C; Benson LN; Warr MR; Yeo E; Yip J; Jaigobin CS; Webb G; McLaughlin PR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Aug; 62(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 15274165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of residual shunts after initial percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a single center experience with immediate and long-term follow-up.
    Diaz T; Cubeddu RJ; Rengifo-Moreno PA; Cruz-Gonzalez I; Solis-Martin J; Buonanno FS; Inglessis I; Palacios IF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 20578100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Flatstent versus the conventional umbrella devices in the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.
    Aral M; Mullen M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 85(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 25413379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patent foramen ovale closure following cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: Long-term follow-up of 301 cases.
    Mirzaali M; Dooley M; Wynne D; Cooter N; Lee L; Haworth P; Saha R; Gainsborough N; Hildick-Smith D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(6):1078-84. PubMed ID: 26105198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with AMPLATZER occluder devices - influence of anatomic features: a transcranial Doppler and intracardiac echocardiography study.
    Marchese N; Pacilli MA; Inchingolo V; Fanelli R; Loperfido F; Vigna C
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 23872652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke: Expert consensus of the French Neurovascular Society and the French Society of Cardiology.
    Mas JL; Derex L; Guérin P; Guillon B; Habib G; Juliard JM; Marijon E; Massardier E; Meneveau N; Vuillier F
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2019; 112(8-9):532-542. PubMed ID: 31378692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial experience with the novel patent foramen ovale occlusion device Nit-Occlud® in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack.
    Steinberg DH; Bertog SC; Momberger J; Franke J; Hofmann I; Renkhoff K; Joy S; Vaskelyte L; Sievert H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1262-7. PubMed ID: 24948394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patent foramen ovale closure by using transesophageal echocardiography for cryptogenic stroke: single center experience in 132 consecutive patients.
    Han Y; Zhang X; Zhang F
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jan; 15(1):11. PubMed ID: 31918738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter PFO closure with GORE(®) septal occluder: early and mid-term clinical results.
    Butera G; Saracino A; Danna P; Sganzerla P; Chessa M; Carminati M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 23897659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Case for Selective Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Cryptogenic Stroke.
    Wiktor DM; Carroll JD
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e004152. PubMed ID: 29870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack and patent foramen ovale: the FORI (Foramen Ovale Registro Italiano) study.
    Paciaroni M; Agnelli G; Bertolini A; Pezzini A; Padovani A; Caso V; Venti M; Alberti A; Palmiero RA; Cerrato P; Silvestrelli G; Lanari A; Previdi P; Corea F; Balducci A; Ferri R; Falcinelli F; Filippucci E; Chiocchi P; Grandi FC; Ferigo L; Musolino R; Bersano A; Ghione I; Sacco S; Carolei A; Baldi A; Ageno W;
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2011; 31(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 21088390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Residual Shunt after Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke: Serial Bubble Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography Data.
    Moon J; Kim M; Oh PC; Shin DH; Park HM; Jo YY; Lee JS; Kang WC
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2019 Feb; 28(2):347-353. PubMed ID: 30396838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.